Dave wrote:
You have now stated the difference between what Subatomic did and what the mongerers do in Costa Rica. In Costa Rica, the girls make themselves available, for pay, for us to let off steam and, perhaps, save our sanity and marriage. Subatomic had no idea of the her motivation whatsoever. Again, you are guessng. ...I will also venture to say that many wives would not want to know about it and would be happy with it if it enabled them to stay in their relationships. Sometimes, not knowing certain things is better than knowing.
Just who is doing the guessing here? How do you know the wives wouldn't want to know or would be happy about it if they were kept in the dark? How do you know that wife DIDN'T have the exact same motivation of letting off steam or saving her sanity or marriage. More importantly, what is the bigger issue, their unknown motivations or what really motivates us. This wife clearly made her own decision for WHATEVER reason. Subatomic wasn't luring her into infidelity or preventing her from finding some other guy. And do you think it really matters to most wives whether the girls their husbands cheated with just did it for money?
I also think you are comparing different roles here. I did not mean to compare subatomic with what mongers do, at least not directly. What I was doing was comparing what mongers do with what that WIFE was doing (and saying it was basically the same thing or perhaps even slightly less immoral) and THEN comparing what she did with the comparatively innocent actions of subatomic who was not even a party to any marriage contract. Are you saying it is worse for a single to accept sex from a married women than for a married person to go out and have sex outside their marriage? Also, are you now saying it is somehow better to have indiscriminate sex with multitudes of relatively high risk prostitutes than to have an isolated affair with some guy off the street? Are you saying that if one really wants to save one's marriage it is better to lie to your spouse rather than try and work through the problems that are driving you towards cheating in the first place?
I definitely agree with you that "everyone should have some level of morals". I just think it is often hard if not impossible for one person to categorically define that for another. As "mongers" we should all be sensitive to this problem. There seem to ME to be plenty of inconsistencies in your own personal definition (as I've pointed out), but I wouldn't presume to say your choices are wrong for you.
My own personal guideline is a) all parties involved choose to involve themselves freely and b) no one gets harmed. It could be argued that the spouse (husband or wife) is indirectly involved or harmed, IF they find out. But you yourself created rationalizations that could justify that risk that could equally apply to either the male or the female involved in the infidelity. Drawing further distinctions and splitting more hairs would be just more rationalizing.