BangBang57 wrote:
Sorry my friend but your definition of "PRO" and mine (and I think, most people)
Well, yes, when most people hear "pro" they hear "pro athlete". We are on a monger forum. Definitions vary. You don't want to bring "most people" into this.
BangBang57 wrote:
The first time she receives compensation, she has placed herself in the position of being a prostitute (puta) -someone who is compensated for sex. She may never do it again but she is/was still a prostitute.
Yeah that's not how the English language works. The word prostitute is a noun describing someone "who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse especially for money". Implied in that definition is the continued engaging in said promiscuous sexual intercourse. If it happened only once you may use the word "prostituted" as a transitive verb as in "She prostituted herself that one time when she received $1000 in exchange for sex" and so on but it would be inaccurate, ungrammatical, and a style error to refer to the one-timer woman in your example as a "prostitute".
BangBang57 wrote:
I am not sure just how one can be "partly" a puta.
Well, let me enlighten you. Let's use the example of this lingerie model I was banging a few months ago. She had a really plastic body which would normally be a turn off for me but it just happened to work on her. Gigantic fake ass, even bigger fake boobs and a perfectly flat stomach with fake blonde hair. I would almost dismiss her as a parody of a barbie doll but when she walks around in lingerie no man can avoid getting a boner. She appeals to very primal instincts especially when only partially clothed. I approached her after this lingerie show a friend had dragged me to. We talked for a few minutes and I invited her for drinks the next day. Note that my friend knew this girl to the extent that another gentleman we both know had previously approached her for a strict pay for play deal after a similar show and she got quite pissed and threatened to call security. So I thought I would likely need to wine and dine this girl to get in her pants. However when she showed up for the "date" wearing a dress that left little to the imagination I was a bit dazed and sorta confused but I was having trouble thinking straight as you might imagine. Well, 5 minutes into the "date" she kissed me and and whispered "I know what you want so you want to get out of here?". At that point I pulled myself together and basically artfully asked her how much? She goes "I like you, $250". I didn't argue. Off we went. Once the deed was done and we were sitting in bed talking I asked her if she met a lot of "suitors" at her events and she said "some, but I only entertain them if they approach me the right way, like you did. If you can't behave yourself I'll kick your ass out real quick". What she meant to say was she doesn't appreciate direct approaches like our idiot pal who went up to her and actually offered $400 (nearly twice as much as what I paid) for "sexo hoy despeus". Now, was money exchanged? Yes. Was it ANYTHING like a "MP session"? No. Did she prostitute herself that day and several times after that? Yes. Is she a prostitute? No, because that is not her profession. In fact, I had to stop seeing her when she told me (after 4 "dates") that she was doing quite well with the modeling thing right now and needed no more money and wanted to stop the pay for play and switch to a standard BF-GF thing. She did reiterate that if she ever needed cash she'd just come to me and as her boyfriend she hoped I would "help her out". I hate that sort of thing on many levels because I don't want to be on the hook for some unforeseen figure down the road when her Grandma is hospitalized or whatever. Besides, I cannot do that anyway because I would then have to be more accessible as her boyfriend and Latinas don't get wife boundaries. I have already tried this experiment before with disastrous results so I stopped calling her and basically disappeared. She only had my email and kept emailing me for a week or so but I basically said goodbye and stopped responding after awhile. Besides, my interest had waned already because 4-5 times is usually the most I can see a woman anyway before I'm done with her.
BangBang57 wrote:
BUT, SHE STILL sees me and about 8-9 other long time regulars (for money)!! Yes, she was a PRO and she still is a PRO!!!
A lady with a standard list of 9 "regular" johns is a prostitute no doubt. The girls I am talking about don't fit the bill.
BangBang57 wrote:
You said you "have not banged an all out pro in years"???
A figure of speech but it has been a while. At least none this year. There were some last year if memory serves.
BangBang57 wrote:
Since you say you do not go to places like the REY
I have been to the Del Rey on many occasions so it is not as if I've never seen the inside of it. In fact I visited last year with a friend from out of town who had heard much about the place (who was also pretty sorely disappointed with the talent once he got there, him being used to Vegas *******). Considering the lingerie model story I just told you do you find it likely that a girl this finicky would find herself in the Rey offering sex to any Tom, Dick & Harry for $100? If you believe that then no further rational discussion can be had with you on this topic.