Despite what I jokingly said earlier, I don't think Capo is really a bad guy. I just think he's being a tad unfair in this case. And I don't think this girl is really a bad girl either. She was doing what she thought she had to do and she made a mistake as people her age (or any age for that matter) often do.
And I don't think Capo deliberately set her up to fail, though I suspect a bigger part of him than he admits feared she would. I wouldn't call it fear of commitment per se, but there does appear to be something going on in that he historically has felt the need to go to such unusual lengths to test the women he's been about to become involved with. I don't mean to sound judgemental, since I think probably many of us here have similar issues. I'm sure I do.
Let me throw in a few other points. Capo, I realize you had gotten to know her over a TLN and 3 whole weekends, but you were also ready to go back that very next weekend after only one TLN and regardless, that time is hardly a lot to expect such a commitment. Besides you yourself admit were not quite ready to totally commit yourself to not seeing other women (had you stopped seeing your GF back home?), so isn't a little hypocritical to expect as much from her?
I also think dapanz stated very well and succintly one of the things I was alluding to in my prior posts (or intended to).
dapanz1 wrote:
Regardless of how either party feels about the other. Whether it be love for each other as people. Or love for each other as sexual beings. Or love for money. When money exchanges hands for sexual services, there is no way of ever bringing the relationship back to what we know as "normal." I dare anyone to disagree with that statement.
Not only don't I not disagree with that but I agree 200%.

(Huh? I think I said that right. How's that for a quadruple negative?)
Attempting to form relationships in such circumstances is undoubtedly even unadvisable for someone with your outlook and background. Some guys can at least deal with the doubt and lack of control of what their "novia" does when they are not around. Personally, I do it by never really considering them a "novia", but a provider (or former provider) with whom I share feelings of affection, friendship and lust (primarily on my part) and financial attraction on her part. I may or may not still act as their client in terms of my financial support of them, but always remember how we met and what they may still be doing with others to get by. Apparently you either lack that trust and/or can not just accept the knowledge that she might stray from the path you prefer her to take.