Nice to see someone knows the difference between morals and ethics and that some people seem to take their AGREEMENTS with the chicas seriously. Also, I love the "white knight" attack; since we are delving into the realm of moral philosophy, lets call that what it is, a the most simple minded and useless version of an ad hominem argument.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem (normally don't like wikipedia, but this suffices here).
I could give a shit about the morality of the situation; but I do care about the ethics. Ethics, in this situation, are about the agreements people make between each other. For instance, I pay a chica cien for TLN, I expect that she will treat me ethically and provide me the negotiated service.
By the same token, the chica lets you take her picture, for your own use, and you use it for the web, you have broken your contact with her. Why do we care about this, why should we not just say-"Phuck them, they are whores?" Well, forget the notions of human dignity and "do on to others" for moment, and lets be practical. The more frequently guys behave unethically toward chicas, the quicker they become hard core, and see us as objects to treat unethically themslves. In their mind, if a gringo has phucked them over ten times, well, why meet my end of the deal, and why not steal from them? All of us who have been around for a while have seen a sweet chica phucked over and have watched some grow hard core over time. Unethical behavior contributes to this. So, treat a chica unethically, and you have ruined the GFE for the next guy.
Ok, some of you will argue that if a chica lets you take pictures, and if you do not directly promise that you will not post her pictures on the web, than you did not break trust or the agreement. This is what we call implied agreement. When a chic puts her C*ck in your mouth, it is implied that she will not bite it off- you don't need say anything. When you take a chica into your room, it is implied that she will have sex with you (some things have to be negotiated, but this is basic and implied). Think of the sitaution, you say to a chica lets go, 80 bucks, and then she says to you in the room "well, I never said I will have sex with you, only that I will go to your room for 80 bucks." You will feel scammed and violated, and are more likely to be on guard next time (highly unlikly, but as an example). Most certainly you will kick her ass out.
Gaining chicas trust and implying to them that photographs are for your use only and then posting them on the web is unethical. Using them for finanical gain is even more so. It has NOTHING to do with morality- the more guys who are unethical toward chicas the more they will be unethical toward us. I like my GFE- GFE demands a level of trust from a chica. Chicas to really give you good gfe need to let their guard down (and Phuck, this is not about love, this is about the basic essentical biological need for women to feel safe- to women, safty comes before sexy).
Why do you think some places "go bad"- they start off with chicas full of trust and then they get phucked over. Of course, it goes both ways, many of the "little darlings" are crooks to start with and want to scam inexperienced mongers- but not all. Many get turned hardcare by unethical behavior.
Phuck morality- I don't care if you have a threesome with a chica and her 90 year old grandmother and have the chic eat her gradmas snatch, if that is what you negotaite with them...What I don't what you doing is behaving like an irresponsble little boy who cannot keep a deal- growth the Phuck up!
If you want to post picture on the web, than tell the chica and compensate her for it. It is the American way. It is capitalism, may it long last. If Cuba Dave wants to post pictures on Craigs list and other places, he should be ethical and give the chicas the option of saying yes or no, and pay them for exactly what he intends to do. Just like we demand they do for us. I want salad tossing, I am going to ask for it upfront, and if she does not give it to me, out she goes without money. She broke our agreement and she deserves nothing. If she meets our agreement and goes above and beyond- I may tip her.
This has nothing to do with rescuing the chicas-that also is for little boys who never grew up. But so is having to dehumanize the chicas. Guys who tend to do this are those who are not strong enough to set bounderies while things are happening, so they have to demonize the chicas before hand so they don't fall for them- a classic defense mechanism. Or, guys who have not had good relationships and have to blame women for their own inadequacy and pain. Damn man, they have no power over you unless you give it to them. But clearly, I digress.
It has to do with stepping up and making good on your agreements, and compensating people for their efforts, and not phucking it up for the next guy.
Most of this post was not geared toward any one poster, so, perhaps no more ad hominem arguments
