El Ciego wrote:
Nola504 wrote:
Dean wrote:
I would say talk to the CRT gentleman when you are down there and point out girls you like (in this case, it is not so impolite to point). Get the scoop and then decide.
Good advice. With the number of members who are going to be in the house the last weekend in August, I should get some info on most chicas.

Nola.... Yes, you'll get solid information from many CRT brothers, but please remember:
Y
M
M
V.
Just because a couple guys have had stellar experiences with a given girl, it's no guarantee that you will, too. There are a thousand or more variables that will affect the quality of your sessions. Recommendations and intel are strictly starting points.
SMellvis (BTW, love your screen name!), I dislike the term "game'" when it amounts to chest-thumping. I think that most guys here using the term mean something like "knowledge of women, a bit of psychology, self-confidence and (maybe) the ability to communicate." Nothing more.
Cujo's is a handsome devil who speaks flawless Spanish and is younger than I. These three facts don't give him "game." What gives him game IMO is his ability to relax and be "normal," to treat the girls like they're valuable but not indispensable, and to communicate to the girls that they need to act more like civilian chicas than whores if they want to hang with him.
Pacifica55 uses a somewhat different tack, including a "system" of sorts that he has refined over some forty years of dating.
"Game" isn't something magical, nor is it standardized in any way. Yes, there are universals, including staying relaxed and confident... but everyone's M.O. will vary by person and by situation.
From what you've written, your game isn't all in your wallet. You may have "game" and not even know it...many guys do.

I agree substantially with the above post. However, when saying "YMMV", a lot of guys insist that it really means "YMWV" (Your Mileage
Will Vary), meaning every guy will always have a substantially different experience with a given chica - and this I don't think is really the case.
I believe about 90% or more of the providers out there fall into any of several categories. Some are really amazing, seem to like sex a lot, and put maximum effort and enthusiasm into the experience, others are a bit indifferent and usually offer a decent but not totally mind-blowing time, others simply try to do the minimum required, a few are outright ripoff artists. Yes, they're still women of course - with all the complexity and unpredictability that entails - but never forget that they're
working - in the end they're just doing a job.
To cite an example of the first category, you can take a girl like former Krysis/ZB girl Kristina. Rarely if ever has anyone reported a bad experience with her - indeed most guys are blown away and repeat at will. There are others like her of course, but this will do for the purpose of this post.
This brings to light my main point - everything being equal, there will be less variation in the results a group of mongers will get with a particular provider than the results a particular monger will get with a group of providers. In other words, 90% of the guys out there are going to have a great experience with Kristina, Karen, or whomever - no matter what they're bringing to the table. On the other hand, I don't care how good looking you are, how much style you have, how good your Spanish is, what kind of "game"/attitude or understanding of female psychology you're capable of - but NO monger is going to have a 90% success rate with a given group of providers and pull "Kristina-like" performances out of every girl. And anyone that says they do IMHO is talking out of the wrong orifice.
Which is why in the end there still IS some value in the recommendations/experiences offered about particular providers on public boards like these. It's up to the reader to then consider and evaluate the credibility of the source and go from there.