VB, I think you can assume that we ALL AGREE that the link between casinos and drugs is ludicrous.
Californicationdude wrote:
I cannot believe Big John at the DR would be involved with the drug trade.
Big John is making too much money off of poor pay-out ratios, overpriced rooms and drinks, and chica fees to put up with that sort of thing going on in his place. Sure some of the his bar patrons or even some employees may try to get away with some things under the table, but HDR mgmt does everything it can do to prevent that sort of thing and root it out (e.g. the cameras all over the place and multiple security guards). The only drug dealing I ever witnessed around the HDR was the oregano that some of the street riff-raff were trying to foist on passing gringos on the sidewalks OUTSIDE of the HDR. And I seriously doubt limiting casino hours has any impact at all on any of that.
Similarly, Chunkzilla tries to link casinos and prostitution and particularly by extension und***ge prostitution. As you have pointed out the ONLY casino that has any significant prostitution going on inside of it is the HDR. The prostitutes are just following the money. If a casino closes down and guys with money no longer hang out there, the prostitutes will just move to someplace they do. If a casino like the HDR closes down, guys with money would still be hanging out there because guys go to the HDR as much for the prostitutes as for the gambling if not even much more. And the chicas would still be there even while the casino is closed because the guys are still there.
As for "saving the Ch*ldren", there may be a few und***ge girls that sneak into the HDR with fake ID's but, as with the drugs, HDR mgmt does everything it can to prevent that for the exact same reason. They don't want to put their moneymaking machine at risk by allowing stupid stuff like that to go on. I'm sure there is a LOT more und***ge prostitution going on out on the streets or in hidden brothels catering to TICOS. And, even if there wasn't, there would be if shuts down all the high profile places like casinos where she THINKS it is going on.
And, even IF you accepted the spurious connection between casinos and prostitution, closing the casinos because SOME of them have SOME prostitution going on in them would be like banning cars because some people drive drunk. The crime is driving DRUNK, not just driving. And the crime is picking up prostitutes in a gambling establishment, not just gambling there.

No wait, prostitution there or anywhere else is not even illegal. Going after the casinos for something that ALLEGEDLY goes on in them, penalizes EVERYBODY who works or gambles there EVEN if they don't have anything to do with any prostitution. If you don't like prostitution and that is what you're trying to stop, then target THAT rather than everybody who "drives cars". Not that I'm really advocating her doing that, but it at least it would make more "sense" and would be more honest and focused on her real target.
---------
Re: ID's post, I'm not sure I see the relevance. A scummy con artist makes unsubstantiated CLAIMS of connections to SOME of the casinos as a way of explaining how he was able to offer the high returns he did (the Villalobos Bros. used "factoring" as their source of profits). The article itself seemed to call into serious question the credibility of those claims and painted Milanes's business as more likely just another Ponzi scheme. It seems pretty clear successful casinos like the HDR didn't need his investments (although they may have invested with him) and he was most likely really just using the money from his later investors to pay off his earlier ones (and enlarging his Swiss bank accounts) rather than investing it into anything real, like casinos, that would offer a genuine return.