Thank you for the thoughtful response, Prolijo. I'd like to address a couple points you made. I have shortened your quoted portion to that which I feel is applicable:
Prolijo wrote:
I'd like to respond to Pac on a few items:
Tman's post was about traits necessary for a successful LONG term relationship. "Success" may not be defined as "white picket fence" but LTR is pretty clear. No one ever said that ANY of those traits were necessary for a successful SHORT term relationship with a working girl, which is all that most M-men really have. Spending all your time with your "novia" for a week at a time is not the same thing as spending 24/7/52. Even if you spend all your time with her every visit, it still basically amounts to a series of STR's. The key is that by the time you start getting on each other's nerves its time to go home and by the time you come back you've had time to reset.
Let me clarify: I live in San Jose and we are together practically 24/7/365. I am her "best friend" by her admission. To me, "long term" means we are shooting for forever. I am just too cynical to put a lot of faith in how long "forever" is. We both acknowledge how important good honest communications are and spend a lot of time making sure that we are on the same page. Our relationship is anything but "typical' but ti works for us and that is the important part. We don't try to fit a conventional mold as we are far too warped for that.
Prolijo wrote:
4) By your own admission, her primary "predisposition" is security (aka financial support) and your "preoccuption" or primary basis for attraction is her physical attractiveness and your mutual preoccupation on things sexual. That might be a sufficient basis for a "successful" short or even medium term relationship if that is all either of you want out of it, but how far can that really take you.
When I said that women are primarily attracted to security I was speaking of all women. It is written in their basic code in the same way that men are predisposed to seek the best specimen for replication. Her "working" or non-working status has nothing to do with it. All women seek a safe nest and men seek the best replicator. It is hard wired.
If physical attraction were her only draw, she would have been finely phucked and out the door likes too many of others. Instead, I found myself taking her night after night. She is intelligent, has a good sense of humor, has the keenest eye for social interaction and observation that I have ever seen and she happens to be great in bed (or we are off the same half-bubble, which makes it great). She is neither stingy nor self-centered and is completely devoted to fairness and "just" rewards. I gotta like that just for the rareness.
Finally, I don't recommend my path to the majority. Maintaining the relationship is a full time job and you better have your game face on. I absolutely enjoy it because she keeps me on my toes (and she is wearing ballet slippers to stay on hers).
In my opinion, the death knell for many "typical" relationships is our (men's) tendency to complacency in a relationship. Once we have "won" the girl, we want to lounge on the couch. She will have attention, one way or another so we either provide the attention on the front end or she will remind us on the back end.
Like I said, it ain't for everybody but it is also not impossible depending on what you want and what you are willing to give for it in terms of compromise.
As for the money issue, I provide what she needs (she never bothers me with frivolous requests). I have not paid her for sex for over five months yet I get all I want plus a whole lotta love. I have no complaints.
_________________
"Your love gives me such a thrill
but your love don't pay my bills,
I NEED THE MONEY!" - John Lee Hooker
Disclaimer: The above is merely the opinion of the author unless specific scientific data is included.
Your mileage may vary.
https://costaricaticas.com/phpBB2/viewto ... 978#206978
