Seahawk wrote:
There are a few members that are having a problem with other members that haven't paid the $100 one time lifetime fee to belong to this board. There are many of us that live in SJ most of the year, like myself. Most of us have more information than is shown on this board. I think ADMIN should make such coments, if they want the $100 or even the $39. Not the members that are using the board for thier own business'. I used to post a lot of good Info on the board 5 years ago, until I got flammed on every post by the same members, or may I say corrected by these no it alls. They know who they are, but probably to stupid to know what they were saying.
I hope you don't consider me to be one of those know-it-alls you're referring to. I don't think I've ever gotten on ANY one's case JUST for not wanting to pay the fee to become a VIP. I think I do have a pretty good idea who you ARE referring to however.
I completely agree that there are more ways of contributing to this board than by simply paying some money. Contributing useful information should count for at least as much if not more. I also completely agree that is a guy's choice whether he wants to go that extra step and contribute the fee or not. He certainly should not be picked on JUST for that. Where I personally might draw the line is that, if you don't have money invested in the board, you don't have quite as much right to complain about how things are being done. If you don't like it, you can always walk. Finally, on your behalf, I also agree that there are certain members (not to single any one out...ID) who I feel are overly negative in their posts, but those guys are that way with everyone, not just you personally, and you should just take it from where it comes and let it wash over you.
HOWEVER, all that being said, I've reviewed your recent posting history and quite frankly could not find anything that should have prompted your latest post. In none of them did I see anything that in any way singled you out for being a non-paying member who was not entitled to speak his mind and, even if there were any that I missed, it certainly wasn't on "every post by the same members".
In fact, if anything, some of YOUR posts seemed somewhat inflammatory themselves towards a certain member whose MP walking tours you apparently don't approve of (and what you saw as negativity on their part was just their response to the tone you took first). Without getting into the particular merits of your case against those tours, THE TONE YOU HAVE USED IN SOME OF THOSE POSTS COULD CERTAINLY HAVE BEEN MORE CIVIL. In short, IMHO, you're being paranoid to think that anyone somehow has it out for you and actually should look in the mirror first before complaining about any one else's tone.