MM3 wrote:
crnewbie903 wrote:
Guys thanks a lot for your feedback and suggestions.
3) I assumed all the chicas in HDR or SL are definitely not und**ge as their IDs have been checked.....but I stand corrected now....will keep in mind to stay away from any chica that might look below 22 ( no way to tell but will keep away from very young looking ones to be safe)
You are overthinking this.
Any question? Ask to see her cedula. Could she be an international mastermind-level criminal with a false cedula? Sure - it is possible.
HDR and it's sub-venue Key Largo scan the chicas' cedulas with a camera system. SL has a pre-screen system for the chicas that are allowed in the bar - some one has examined their cedula. LA takes the chica's cedula and holds it. For 'non-SL' chicas, their security logs them in and checks them against their banned list. Taormina makes a copy. The Sleep Inn has you fill out tons of paperwork before you pay.
It is in these places interest to be vigilant (by CR standards). Immigration raids (for illegal Nicas, etc.) or vice raids (for und***ge chicas) are bad for business.
The und***ge ticas are busy phucking their tatted up bad boy tico boy friends and getting pregnant at 14. If they start 'working' after they get thrown out of the house they do it on the street.
A few points.
1. It`s doesn`t take any "mastermind" to use a friend or relative`s ID, so from the start your glibness undermines your credibility. Checking the IDs of younger looking chicas is not only not a waste of time but an excellent idea. If they are legit they shouldn`t mind at all, while it can earn you points for being conscientious.
2. If you think all the und***ge sex workers in San Jose are working the streets you are a moron.
3. There`s no ID scanner in use that can match the face of the one carrying the ID with the picture on the ID itself.
4. It`s ultimately the responsibility of the John to determine the age of the hooker he has relations with. No complaints that someone else failed in some alleged "vigilance" will be accepted as a defense.
5. This all applies to the MPs as well, where who knows what IDs or lame excuses for IDs may or may not have been checked.
6. I believe we settled this self-same topic a few years ago with Mucho Gusto`s chastisement of Bashful Dwarf, who to his credit took the corrections very well. The conclusions should have been made a sticky.
And as an aside, is this MM3 the latest incarnation of Sirlm, the guy that chirps on and on self styling himself as an expert on everything then throws a crying fit when someone questions his reasoning? I`m honestly not sure but is food for thought. He just never has been satisfied talking to himself over in the other forum...
