www.CostaRicaTicas.com

rats.. and here I thought I had an official spokesmen now!

CRGolfer *NEVER* mentioned/suggested/hinted at any form of confrontation, whether physical/friendly/emotional/psychic or otherwise.

The replies to his poll question, and the reply-replies to those show a tendency to passionate feelings on the topic. At some point someone will wander in to SL filming (or at least giving that impression), and this will be immediately followed by duals to the death, assassinations, and global thermonuclear war. I'm not sure which will come first... the crack in my crystal ball is in the way.

Also, in my own defense, I did say "underlying point". CRGolfer may not have brought up the idea of confrontation, but the rest of the thread did.

Full Definition of UNDERLYING

1
a : lying beneath or below <the underlying rock is shale>
b : basic, fundamental <an investigation of the underlying issues>
2
: evident only on close inspection : implicit
3
: anterior and prior in claim <underlying mortgage>
4
: of or being present in deep structure <underlying word order>

Can't we all just get along ... off camera!

_________________
bypassin' kinky, and usin' the whole chicken!!!

Man, you're messing with the self appointed Potentate of All Potentates; the Master Blaster of the Hallways; Our Very Own Hall Monitor, trolling each and every thread to scat sparkles of useless information; spot and terminate self-perceived violations; on the prowl for the uninformed so that "his way" can be taught and ingested. (Hardy har har....). Might want to demonstrate huge respect for our Mascot Mommy, bro.

He bees like that, huh, CRGolfer? Diarrhea of the keyboard and all gnat like. Anomic, really.

_________________
"Actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the over-compensations for misery. And, of course, stability isn't nearly so spectacular as instability. And being contented has none of the glamour of a good fight against misfortune, none of the picturesqueness of a struggle with temptation, or a fatal overthrow by passion or doubt. Happiness is never grand."
- Aldous Huxley, Brave New World, Ch. 16

.

_________________
"If you dont think women are explosive,....drop one."

Now getting back to the topic at hand--it just keeps getting worse: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/20 ... -jumbotron

_________________
"A man accustomed to hear only the echo of his own sentiments, soon bars all the common avenues of delight, and has no part in the general gratification of mankind"--Dr. Johnson
"Amen, brother"-ED

ROFL!!!!!!!!!

The Bro is entertaining himself hugely at everybody's expense with this deep irony. Dean Swift, anyone? I'm the exact opposite, a contranymic: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/anomic

_________________
"A man accustomed to hear only the echo of his own sentiments, soon bars all the common avenues of delight, and has no part in the general gratification of mankind"--Dr. Johnson
"Amen, brother"-ED

Incorrect.

Anomie equates to the failure of existence per Charles Hampden Turner in his epic work, Radical Man. "The point is to act spontaneously from the deepest ethical and human impulse and to discover yourself in a fervent embrace with the complementary human impulse touched off in others. The basic dichotomy of individuality and intimacy is transcended when the lonely act calls forth a warm response."

See http://aanzpa.org/system/files/1013BkRvw2.pdf and Chapter IV (Anomie — The Failure of Existence) .

Gosh, I'm so upset

_________________
"Actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the over-compensations for misery. And, of course, stability isn't nearly so spectacular as instability. And being contented has none of the glamour of a good fight against misfortune, none of the picturesqueness of a struggle with temptation, or a fatal overthrow by passion or doubt. Happiness is never grand."
- Aldous Huxley, Brave New World, Ch. 16

I have repeatedly tried to keep this Thread on track. If the mad-dog foaming-at-the-mouth Bro quoting squirrely and obscure references wishes to engage further, let's take it to the appropriate Forum and get out of these good Bros way here.
I promise you there as much time and space as you and your cohorts need to answer this question--"What is your problem with me?"

_________________
"A man accustomed to hear only the echo of his own sentiments, soon bars all the common avenues of delight, and has no part in the general gratification of mankind"--Dr. Johnson
"Amen, brother"-ED

I think he made it clear in post #62


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"If you dont think women are explosive,....drop one."

SpeakNo: It's not really "fair" to use a number like 62 when one is only capable of counting to 20 (that's ten digits on the hand and ten on the feet); and with some degree of difficulty even with that.

Irrespective, your post is 100% correct. Thank you for saving me the time of having to re-type. WE're having fun on an internet message board. That's right, WE're......the Royal We: Here in Steven1 land WE stand on formality.........

_________________
"Actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the over-compensations for misery. And, of course, stability isn't nearly so spectacular as instability. And being contented has none of the glamour of a good fight against misfortune, none of the picturesqueness of a struggle with temptation, or a fatal overthrow by passion or doubt. Happiness is never grand."
- Aldous Huxley, Brave New World, Ch. 16

Your most welcome sir.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"If you dont think women are explosive,....drop one."

This is what we get for belonging to a coupon/discount board instead of mongering board. What a pile of crap. And somebody kick the asshole with the camera in the balls. In a normal mongering universe we wouldn't even have to discuss the question, never mind have a poll on it. Dumb shits like that Phuck up people's lives, careers and families.

getting back to the actual event, he was wearing a chest-harness camera, and after a tour of the city he walked into the SL for a drink. He stated the camera was off and the entire rig was too big to put in his pocket.

Don't you think accusations of 'phucking up people's lives' is just a teensy bit harsh here (never mind calls to bodily assault)?

_________________
bypassin' kinky, and usin' the whole chicken!!!

Back to the original point. Why should someone have to ASSUME the camera is off? Who cares if it is too big to fit in a pocket! Would seem simple to take off and set aside!

This entire thing has been blown apart and hijacked by 50 different ideas from hall monitor to general douche baggery.

I think the general consensus was walking around Montgering area ps with a camera was not a generally accepted practice in people's OPINIONS!

Furthermore, many people continue to show their true colors!

To add one more point then I shall never speak again on this subject.....

Never about a venue specific, or specific person, simply about a simple question based off of behavior I saw. Brought it up over breakfast with some people at the time and that consensus left me to ask the broad question. But of course several got their panties in a wad and manipulated the entire original post.

Moving on..... NEXT,!!!