Whosear wrote:
Some info for perpetual tourists:
1. There is no requirement to stay out 72 hours in Costa Rican law. My client who is seeking residency had to leave one last time so when to Bocas, stayed 1 hour, and returned. However, the immigration official then has all sorts of tricks such as requiring a return ticket out of Costa Rica, limiting your new visa, or maybe not letting you in at all.
2. If you are a perpetual tourist and want to avoid hassles at the border, don't wait until day 85 or 95 to leave. Go out at 30, 75 21 or 80 days, and most likely you will not be questioned so much.
3. If you overstay your visa, then the alternatives are to seek someone reliable to have it stamped for a fee, travel King's Quality to Nicaragua, or take your chances at the Sixoala crossing and pay a, "fine". One friend overstayed for 1 year, took the bus to Nicaragua, and no questions were asked.
Regarding travel to Columbia, Nicaragua, Panama et al...talk to people in CR who travel there frequently. Columbia was a mess in the 90's, but it's on it's way up, and Americans are loved. Granada is a destination of choice for many and I've heard nothing bad except no putas obvias...take a seasoned guide with you to Managua. Another friend spent 1 month backpacking and had nothing but fun, and he went everywhere.
1: I am certainly not an attorney in Costa Rica and there is a lot of debate as to whether there is a 72 hour requirement or not--some say no; some say only immigration has such a requirement; some say only customs; some say yes, there IS such a requirement!! It seems to be one of many cases where CR wants there to be ambiguity in the law so they can twist it to suit their desires at the moment. It is for sure that many have left for an hour and returned with no problems; others have had all kinds of problems trying to re-enter in less than 72 hours. Each individual officer at any border seems to be able to do what ever they happen to be in the mood to do. Because of bus schedules, I have always (20+ times) returned in about 65-68 hours and no one has ever said a thing. As cheap as hotels and restaurants are in Nicaragua or Panama I see no reason to risk any less time.
2:I kind of understand what you are saying but not at all sure it makes any difference. Every one of those 20+ trips I have made have been at 88 to 90 days and only one time have I even been asked for a return ticket out of the country. Have never had any problem with getting a 90 day visa, and have never been hazzled except for being over the $500 limit on things I was bring back from David (was not over and had all reciepts, but it was not worth arguing with them). OH, and that was on my first two trips out of the country, 5 years ago.
3: I agree with what you are saying about some "buying" their way out of trouble, BUT, why?? When one can travel to David or Granada for 3 days (and there are working chicas in both, and lower priced than SJ) for less than $200 total. For $200 and 3 days, why risk not being allowed back into the country????? Just does not make sense to me!! I know many do not like the idea of 8-9 hours on the bus but it is what you make it to be--I personally have almost always had fun on the bus (have meet several chicas).
4: As for travel to other countries--I had a condo in Colombia at what was suppose to be the height of the FARC--I never not once had a problem nor even felt any fear; and I traveled all over the country-have been in every major city. In my opinion, Granada and David are both much safer than SJ--have walked all over both at night and no problems. Now Managua is a different story, and Panama City, I understand has some bad area.
_________________
Old and retired but still bang, and bang, and bang!!!
