www.CostaRicaTicas.com

Welcome to the #1 Source for Information on Costa Rica
It is currently Sat Aug 02, 2025 7:13 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 10:44 am 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 6:15 pm
Posts: 3785
Location: Washington, DC and Fort Lauderdale
article from todays sun sentinel



She wanted a piece of paradise — a tropical retirement home where the temperature is warm, the air is clean and the crowds and stress of South Florida are far, far away.

Along with hundreds of other people nationwide, Davie resident Lorraine Fox entrusted that dream to Hollywood-based Paragon Properties of Costa Rica. Four years and $115,000 later, the 55-year-old real estate agent has nothing to show for it.

A lawsuit filed in federal court alleges Paragon Properties was "a Ponzi-type scheme," targeting people near or at retirement age. More than 900 Paragon Properties customers put down deposits for about 2,500 parcels of land in Costa Rica within the last six years, yet much of the land remains untouched and not a single customer has had a home built, according to court records.


Paragon Properties' chairman has said the company's 16 planned communities, primarily on the Central American country's Pacific coast, stalled because of a poor economy and difficulties in obtaining local building permits. As of last fall, the company had been waiting for months for financing to come through, chairman and owner Bill Gale said in an October deposition in an earlier lawsuit against Paragon Properties.

"We don't have the funds," he said. "They are not there, but we continue to work for [Paragon Properties' clients]."

But desperate customers told the Sun Sentinel they haven't been able reach anyone at Paragon Properties for weeks. The front door at the company's Harding Street office is locked. Anyone calling the office phone number is greeted by an automatic message saying the company is pursuing funding to move forward with its development projects.

"Paragon, like the paradise it purports to sell, is a myth," wrote Matthew Sarelson, the Miami-based attorney spearheading the federal lawsuit filed against the company. So far, 27 Paragon Properties customers with deposits totaling more than $1.7 million have signed on to the court action filed in Miami.

The lawsuit names 32 people or companies Sarelson says were involved in the Costa Rican land offer. Among them is Stephen Tashman, a South Florida businessman who has been sanctioned by federal judges in the past for three other business ventures that were ordered to pay more than $40 million in restitution and fines for misrepresentations to investors.

Customers' outrage over Paragon Properties has been steadily building. The company has been the target of 37 complaints filed with the state Attorney General's Office as well as 15 lawsuits in state and federal court. The Better Business Bureau of Southeast Florida gave Paragon Properties an "F" grade.

Lawyers suing the company say it meets the definition of a Ponzi scheme.

"They were using new money to pay off the old money," said attorney Richard Schurr, who is representing a Hollywood man who handed over $300,000 in deposits to purchase 22 acres. "It wasn't run in a way that it was ever going to be successful."

Gale, 66, said in his October deposition that his company has refunded $16 million in deposits to unhappy customers. When asked if money from new sales had been used to refund old customers, Gale said, "Yes."

"We have been trying for the longest time to obviously obtain the necessary funds to complete the projects, but as you are aware credit markets have become a nightmare, and particularly when it's offshore," Gale said. "We are waiting for the loans. We sit in the office and wait for the calls."

Gale, who declined to comment to the Sun Sentinel, is now representing himself in the federal lawsuit before U.S. District Judge James Lawrence King in Miami.

King will determine whether the case can proceed as a class-action lawsuit.

Customers interviewed by the Sun Sentinel said they learned about Paragon Properties through Internet searches or unsolicited e-mails. They said the offer seemed risk-free: Put down a deposit — usually $25,000 or more — for an undeveloped piece of Costa Rican land. Once infrastructure like roads, sewage and electricity was put in, the buyer could finish paying for the land and then contract with another company to build a home on the property.

Paragon Properties helped pay for clients to fly down to Costa Rica to look at their parcels. After the trip, there was a 10-day window to ask for a full refund, according to customers' contracts. In at least five lawsuits filed against Paragon Properties, clients allege they made such demands but the company didn't give their money back.

There appeared to be other protections in place. Some of the contracts had clauses that buyers could get their money back if the infrastructure wasn't completed within 18 months "unless prevented by an act of God or other event not within the control of Seller." Some contracts promised people all their money back if for some reason they weren't able to pay the full purchase price of the land in five years.

Customers also believed their deposits were being held in escrow, Sarelson said.

Howard Coleman, a Chicago entertainment booking agent, made $62,000 in deposits for a property with an ocean view. For four years, he said, Paragon representatives promised him the infrastructure for his development was near completion. Last year though, Gale stopped returning his phone calls, he said.

"Obviously they didn't follow through, Coleman said. "It doesn't seem like they even intended to follow through."

Sarelson said the investors he represents are out between $19,100 and $274,000 apiece.

"Psychologically it's been devastating for them on two fronts," he said. "First, the dream of having a retirement home or a vacation home in a beautiful paradise like Costa Rica is gone. Second and perhaps worse, it's a big hit to your pride and ego when you find out you are a victim of a fraud."

Gale said in his deposition that of Paragon Properties' 16 planned developments, basic infrastructure such as roads and drainage had been completed for two of them and five houses — none for customers — had been built.

But without $12.5 million in financing everything stalled, Gale said. In addition, he said, the company had been waiting almost three years for the Costa Rican government to approve construction permits.

Scott Oliver, founder of a website geared toward Americans looking at living in Costa Rica, said getting such permits can be problematic, but dozens of projects have been completed during the last six years in Costa Rica's Central Pacific region

The federal lawsuit alleges Gale was aided by Tashman, who grew up with him in Miami Beach. In earlier business dealings, Tashman left behind a string of angry investors and failed companies. A North Miami Beach company he helped run was ordered by a judge in 1987 to pay more than $12 million for misrepresenting oil and gas leases to investors.

In 1995, another company Tashman was involved in was ordered to pay a $3 million judgment after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said it defrauded people who thought their money was being used to buy and breed ostriches. And in 2006, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Ryskamp leveled a $28 million judgment against Tashman and another company he helped run: Hollywood-based Telecard Dispensing Corp, which sold vending machines for prepaid phone cards.

Tashman "does not appear to have engaged in any operation that was not tainted by fraud," Ryskamp wrote in a July 2006 order.

Tashman told the Sun Sentinel he was involved in Paragon Properties in its first year of operation, but then went to work for Costa Rican Land & Development, a separate company owned by his son-in-law. Tashman said he has no idea why he has been named in the federal lawsuit against Paragon.

"There are no improprieties here," Tashman said. "I got nothing to hide and nothing to lose."

"Paragon has done nothing wrong," he said. "They did everything they could, but when they ran out of money, the s--- hit the fan."

Miami attorney Jeffrey Tew, who has represented Paragon Properties in previous cases, is acting as the lawyer for Tashman's daughter and son-in-law, Lisa and Julian Siegel, and Gale's wife, Judith Gale. They are among the 32 defendants named in the federal lawsuit.

Tew declined to comment to the Sun Sentinel, but in court documents said the federal suit brought by dissatisfied Paragon customers "includes a host of allegations that are immaterial, impertinent or scandalous."

With no clear answers to what happened to her money, Fox said her hopes of a tranquil getaway for her golden years have been replaced with frustration.

"That was supposed to be my retirement money," she said. "I think I'm more embarrassed than anything else because I believed them."

_________________
The difference between a Sea Story and a Fairy Tale is that a Fairy Tale starts out 'Once Upon a Time..' and a Sea Story starts out 'This is no Shit...'

(export version only, some restrictions may apply, some assembly required, not valid where the sun don't shine...

if you live in the states of Poverty, Darkness or anywhere outside of The Blessings of Civilization Trust, Inc...other rules may apply)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:25 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:20 pm
Posts: 12644
In CR, giving money to some crook for something that is "supposed to be built soon" is asking to be ripped off. I'm guessing more than half of those deals are scams. I have a buddy who went in with his brother on a condo that was never built because of "lack of permits". That seems to be the usual excuse. They did not get their 20K back either. Maybe these developers should wait to get the permits before they start taking deposits. :idea:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:24 pm 
Not a Newbie I just don't post much!

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:06 am
Posts: 52
Orange wrote:
Maybe these developers should wait to get the permits before they start taking deposits. :idea:


Very true. Reputable developers would have given the money back, assuming that's what the contract written with the deposit. I supposed the best way to guaranteed the developer carrying our its promise is to have them transfer the land to the buyer's name. At least that gives the buyers something in their possession.
That will also mean more deposit needed, perhaps?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:34 am 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:57 pm
Posts: 9518
Location: NFM--Geezers, cowpokes and the working poor--yeeha!
What amazes me is the number and expertise of the folks that got hooked. Does the phrase "due diligence" mean nothing to them? I am NOT saying they deserved to get scammed but they in part set themselves up for it. Would these folks buy raw land or a projected project in the US without retaining a competent local RE attorney? Yet they seemed to have failed in this basic step before shelling out serious dollars IN A FOREIGN VENTURE with an entirely different legal system with few/no consumer protections. Incredible. Tashman should of course be hung by his thumbs. Yes, he's had all these judgments against him--how many have been paid at even pennies on the dollar? And he's spent how much time in jail?

_________________
"A man accustomed to hear only the echo of his own sentiments, soon bars all the common avenues of delight, and has no part in the general gratification of mankind"--Dr. Johnson
"Amen, brother"-ED


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:22 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 9:33 pm
Posts: 1447
Location: Tampa / St. Pete
Yeah, I have to admit you really have to be stupid to get involved in a condo complex based on a plastic model and some marketing literature; add to that the lack of laws that protect consumers and you have a recipe for disaster. :x

_________________
“Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.” And we are the guys that keep them in Eggs & Grits


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:14 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:24 pm
Posts: 11358
Location: Sabana Oeste , Costa Rica
TimBones wrote:
Yeah, I have to admit you really have to be stupid to get involved in a condo complex based on a plastic model and some marketing literature; add to that the lack of laws that protect consumers and you have a recipe for disaster. :x


The sale of condo units pre-construction (plastic model & marketing literature) is a very common and accepted practice. Most project can not get their construction loan until they meet a percentage of units on which they have signed contracts and deposit money. That is why they offer pre-construction prices

The problem that arises in Costa Rica is that unlike the U.S. their is virtually no regulation and there are a lack of reliable escrow agents who will hold the deposit money until certain benchmarks are met.

_________________
:D Pura Vida :D
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four
essential food groups:
alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat.
Alex Levine
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:48 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 5:56 pm
Posts: 2380
Location: Llano Grande
I don’t see that purchasing property in Costa Rica is a good buy anyway you slice it. There were good buys but they have evaporated over time.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:13 pm 
Ticas ask me for advice!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:33 pm
Posts: 422
I don't think purchasing property in any country is a wise move right now... The US housing numbers stink to high heaven and will likely drag out any chance of a recovery (i.e. employment) for another 24 months... Real Estate in any location has not turned out to be the panacea of asset growth everyone has come to expect from the prior bubble...

Not only that, property ties you to one place... Normally tying up a chunk of capital in possibly a not-so-friendly country where the laws are fluid... No sir, not for me Ronnie... If I get the itch to go somewhere else, I don't want anything tying me down...

Old scam too... There are dozens of these horror stories in and around Pattaya... Do you think any of the investors will get a fair shake in a Thai court??? If the investor balks and causes trouble for the developer, they usually wind up dead or in the monkey house on some trumped up charge... :roll:

_________________
"Mongo only pawn in game of life"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3K6UmgJIOw


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:52 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:21 pm
Posts: 1303
Location: Southeast of Disorder
JazzboCR wrote:
Would these folks buy raw land or a projected project in the US without retaining a competent local RE attorney?

A couple of things Brother Jazzbo:

1. Close.....I believe most CR attorneys would have been ok with the transaction. Paragon has been the 900 pound gorilla in land development the past 6-7 years before and during the boom times. Everybody heard of them, they had a PR machine. We can't say for sure it was their intent to defraud or if they got caught up in the bad econmy and weren't able to complete their projects similar to scores of developers.

2. They are guilty of spending escrows(may not even be illegal in Costa) and charging too much for that land(although not a crime, we know P.T. Barnum's famous quote). I have seen their developments, they basically build an awesome guard gate(really), cut a few trails through the property, and have yet to clear any land.

3. A smart or prudent buyer, and his attorney, would only buy property(especially since it is in a foreign country) contingent on the deposit being held in escrow at his attorney's office wether it be in CR or US, and the balance due in closing. Paragon had so many buyers they probably would not have allowed it, but the number one rule in any negotiation......is being willing to walk away......Said buyer wouldn't have got the land but he wouldn't have seen his deposit go bye-bye either.

Un mas coas, good luck getting any money in a US court for property sold in a foreign country and the company was probably a Panama or CR corp.

CUIDADO!

PURA VIDA!

_________________
Livin' & Lovin' in Key Largo....oh....And the one in The Keys, too!


Last edited by CaptainCohiba on Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:41 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 5:56 pm
Posts: 2380
Location: Llano Grande
Fraud and corruption are rampant especially in real estate. If you own something you have to check all the time at the Registro Civil just to make sure you still own it.

There is a private school in San Jose which has a satellite campus in Guanacaste. Turns out one of the main persons in charge of the campus in Guanacaste campus, let call him Jose, defrauded the organization that legally owns the school by switching out the names of the corporate officers of the true owners, replacing the corporate officers with his name and his wifes name and then transferred the ownership of the original corporation to a new corporation of which Jose and Josephina are the sole stakeholders.

The organization that owns the school may or may not get it back. Real property here can be stolen quickly.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:49 am 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 1787
Location: Los Angeles
I guess another example why it's better to rent than buy.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:21 am 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:29 am
Posts: 2051
Location: Wherever I need to be...
BondTrader wrote:
I guess another example why it's better to rent than buy.


....or maybe neither and simply visit..... 8) :P

_________________
"Actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the over-compensations for misery. And, of course, stability isn't nearly so spectacular as instability. And being contented has none of the glamour of a good fight against misfortune, none of the picturesqueness of a struggle with temptation, or a fatal overthrow by passion or doubt. Happiness is never grand."
- Aldous Huxley, Brave New World, Ch. 16


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:09 am 
CR Virgin - Newbie!

Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:24 pm
Posts: 13
Location: san dimas
never buy a property until it is complete!

_________________
http://costaricanretirementinfo.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 



All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group