J0sie wrote:
Estebahn, I look at eating in Mexico and Costa Rica just like I do at gambling. Your best odds are at the black jack tables because it is a mathematical certain did to it. The same for food preparation, while you might get sick from anywhere, there is a certain LARGER amount of risks that a small establishment will take before either disposing of spoil or contaminated food versus the bigger more establish venues. It is just economics. I rather keep the odds on my favor.
If I understand what you are saying that's kind of subjective without any real way to evaluate your risk at an establishment.
A small establishment as are the sodas in mercado central which does a large amount of business each day is still a small establishment. Just to use an example not to say they have a problem lets use El Balcon Europa. One of the most established places in the gulch dates back to early 1900's. Much larger then any small soda in the mercado. Many guys have reported here that when they dined there the patrons were few and far between.
So who is more likely to take less risk in disposing of spoiled or contaminated food rather then try and squeeze another day out of it? No way to tell based on what has been presented.
If you live in an area that publishes, in the local paper, the results of health department inspections of restaurants I do not think the size or length of time in business will be much different between the list of those who fail or get a warning.
I think one of the major factors in how well a restaurant is operated is the management and we as patrons really do not have a way to judge that. We see the customer service end not the kitchen sanitation end. How do you know if the cook washed his hands after using the bathroom? By the size of the place? By it's reputation? By it length of being in business? Don't think so.
_________________

Pura Vida

Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four
essential food groups:
alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat.
Alex Levine
