Srlim wrote:
Quote:
"I'm not saying it's all fun and games, or that it doesn't have its bad moments, but there are a LOT of worse ways to earn a living."
My question is how can you ever know? Because of what they say? Because they complain they don't make enough? I don't think these are ways to know anything. I would like to see the original too, because if the Pres really said something like that, he's a third-world idiot of the first order.
Yes, some girls tolerate it better than others and learn to enjoy (some) guys, and even fall in love. But there's little question that if they had other opportunities, far fewer would do it. That goes for poor women everywhere, including the U.S. As far as being "forced" or not, that's apples and oranges. The act of forcing is a crime. But just because prostitution is legal does not mean it's of "free volition." True, some girls will never hook, even if they get evicted and their baby is starving. But a society as a whole will surely have more prostitution if it also has less channels for success.
You can always point to exceptional cases of women doing it for a while, keeping a perspective, and rising to become PH.D's. I like to think every woman I ever mongered was a together woman in disguise, with an insatiable appetite for sex, especially with me. But in truth, I could never have a long-term, serious relationship with a pro, or even a semi. Prostitution has a profound affect on girls, some more than others depending on their constitution. And for those PH.D., best-case scenarios, they too will always see men differently.
Having said that, I agree you can't save the world, and if the mutual short-term benefits are not with you, another chap will come along in 5 minutes. So treating them as well as reasonable, including trying to make them forget they're working, is always better than nothing. No need for guilt trips. But delusions of grandeur should be dispensed with, as well.