KenLee wrote:
The problem I have with Phantom's post is basically the same that I have with other mongers generalizing about the chicas. creating turmoil.
KenLee
You seem like a reasonable guy. I appreciate the rational dialog.
But as far as generalizing about chicas, I am not even talking about chicas in this case. What I am talking about the guys that come down here and making a basic observation about what is defined as a "successful relationship" among those in this community.
My argument is based on some pretty simple logic. For some guys, if they can't find an error in the logic they resort to attacking the messenger. Well I push back. Especially when it comes to some of the clowns in this community that come down a few times then think they are experts on what happens here. I am especially rough on those idiots.
As far as your second point is concerned, well I would have to say that is a generalization .....
....... I would say that there is a lot of truth in it. But in the end everyone is wired differently.
Hank Daman wrote:
Phantom wrote:
Hey Mr Daman, are you in the Gutlch everyday? I am. So who are you to tell me that I don't know what I am talking about? In this case I know perfectly well what I am talking about.
And this makes you are relationship expert? Might be the funniest thing I have heard in five years on the board. Why am I feeding this troll anyhow?
When did I say I was a relationship expert? Never said that, never thought that.
You don't have a rational counter argument, so you just take pot shots. So who is the toll butt wipe?