Irish Drifter wrote:
... I don't understand this concern over what China gives to Costa Rica. No one got upset when the Taiwan government was giving CR money for various project. Mainland China is far and away more recognized as the legitimate China then Taiwan by an overwhelming majority of the worlds countries. CR saw the opportunity to help itself out by switching their recognition. The rest of Central America has stayed with Taiwan and are being rewarded with funding of various projects by the Taiwanese.
Remember dollar diplomacy in emerging countries was and is practiced by the United States and most other major powers. It was okay for the U.S. to support Venezuela but now it is a big no no for Russia to do it. Third World countries have and always will be available to the highest bidder.
The reason for the "concern", if you want to call it that, is quite natural. We're NOT the Chinese and they're our economic rivals in the pursuit of natural resources and markets. They also have political goals that they pursue with their trade and aid policies that are antithetical to those pursued by the US.
Taiwan is a good example. The US recognizes China as the "legitimate" MAINLAND China too, what we DON'T recognize is their sovereignty over the island nation of Taiwan. The fact that "far and away" the "overwhelming majority of the worlds countries" does, arguably has more to do with the fact that most countries place economic self-interest (the HUGE Chinese market and/or all the US dollars they have to invest) over principles (as has happened with CR). Taiwan is no
t a paragon of democracy and human rights, but it still has a much better record than China and its citizen's have spoken quite clearly that THEY don't recognize China's sovereignty over them.
OF COURSE, we buy allegiances too (just look at the so-called "Coalition of the Willing"). But, again, most of the time that is to acheive ends that we as US CITIZENS support. OF COURSE, other countries have as much right to try and do that as we do but that doesn't mean we have to be happy about it if they manage to "outbid" us particularly in areas that are close to our hearts. And, rightly or wrongly, we still see the Americas as our backyard and find it particularly troubling when other world powers play in our "sandbox".
The Monroe Doctrine may be old but I don't see why that means it is no longer being applied. Wikipedia may not be the most authoritative source but it's
article on the Monroe Doctrine talks specifically about its application during the Cuban Missle Crisis and, even more recently, during the Contra War in Nicaragua, an interventions in Guatemala, the Salvadoran Civil War and the invasion of Granada. In fact, our current Secretary of Defense (then CIA Director) Robert Gates vigorously defended the Contra operation, arguing that avoiding U.S. intervention in Nicaragua would be "totally to abandon the Monroe doctrine".
As for the Chinese employing their own people, if they're paying the bills they can do whatever they like. It wouldn't surprise me at all if the 500 police cars were shipped over from China, rather than purchased locally, or were at least built at some Chinese owned plant in the region. This is known as "tied aid" and the US does that all the time too. For example, US food aid usually takes the form of US grown grain which does as much to help our farmers (sometimes at the expense of local farmers in the destination countries) as it does to help the locals. If they paid more for Chinese workers than they would have for locals, that's okay with them because nearly all of that money will wind up recirculating in their home economy one way or the other. As I said before, they probably overcharged the workers for the goods and services that they provided them while in CR. However, unless they were duped or "shanghaied" (entirely possible when talking about the human-rights deficient Chinese government), the workers must have netted enough relative to what they were making (or not making) back home or they the government would not have been able to "recruit" them.
JB,
Where did you hear about any Russian or Chinese military bases in Venezuela or elsewhere in the Americas? Russia has been TALKING about that some, but it is highly unlikely from a purely logistic standpoint and is much more likely being used as a BARGAINING CHIP because they're not happy about some of the things WE"VE been doing in THEIR backyard (e.g. NATO membership for Ukraine and Georgia, anti-ballistic missile system deployment in Poland and the Czech Republic, etc.). In fact, even going back to the Cuban Missle Crisis, that ultimately was used as a lever to have us pull our missles that were based in northern Turkey near the border with the USSR.
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080723/114760531.htmlhttp://features.csmonitor.com/globalnews/2009/03/15/a-new-cuban-missile-crisis-russia-eyes-bomber-bases-in-latin-america/