why does he "have to" pay Ch*ld support? court? enforcement agency? moral obligation?
here's a quick observation of either obligation:
If your buddy's brazilian baby-mama was smart, she would have assigned supervision of any child-support obligations to the Ch*ld support enforcement agency (or equivilent thereof) in his jurisdiction. the csea would then automatically deduct his payments from his paychecks, and/or through tax refund interception, or--in an extreme case--through property lien. this makes escape from the obligation extremely difficult. anyone who has EVER dealt with such an agency would agree.
If he's paying her directly, pursuant to some court order, and wanted to be a deadbeat dad, he could just stop paying. This would force the baby-mama to seek judicial enforcement of the underlying obligation; something that would be difficult to do depending on her means. The only risk here is that if she ever returned to the jurisdiction, and had the motivation and means (i.e., $$$) to hire an attorney, or the smarts to petition the local csea, she could seek back Ch*ld support and it all starts over again.
As far as judicial assistance in her own country, I seriously doubt that the brazilian justice system is efficient enough for her to use to issue a judgment against your buddy and then enforce it extraterritorially. Even if it did, as far as I can determine, the Hague Convention is not in force between Brazil and the U.S. And INTERPOL is not going to crash through his door and carry him back to Brazil in chains just because he's not supporting his K*ds....
If his obligation is the former, he could seek some kind of amendment or relief from the payments. maybe the local agency doesn't cover foreign baby-mamas...maybe he could just make something up knowing she won't be available to attend the hearing...
If his obligation is moral, then that's up to him...
|