ID,
Leave it you to correct me. On nitpicking points for that matter
Re: what the old fare was. If you had bothered to notice, I never said you were actually wrong about the $26 rate, only that I was not so sure about it having REALLY gotten that high. That was no mere accident. I carefully worded it that way. Frankly, as that line also suggested I have not
personally taken a cab from the airport in a while (have
YOU?) so
I will readily admit I don't really know
firsthand what they've been charging recently (again, do
you?). Ever since they started charging different amounts for different destinations in SJ rather than one flat rate, the amounts
reported have really been all over the map. I suppose I could dig up some other quotes contemporaneous with the ones you posted that would show much lower amounts. Even one of the quotes that you used showed that at the very least "official" pricing has become inconsistent.
Moving BEYOND all that, this aspect of the fare pricing shows a few more things.
First of all, if the rates really had gotten up as high as $26, then
there has been good reason why so many of us have turned to other much cheaper ways to get to downtown. For us, these changes on airport taxis are basically irrelevant, since we've already completely given up on airport taxis anyway. For others, who had been continuing to use airport taxis, it might be the last straw, that makes them join the rest of us (at which point what the cabbies do becomes irrelevant for them as well).
Secondly, if the rates that different cabbies and ticket window clerks were sometimes gouging some guys for had really gotten up that high,
maybe that is PRECISELY the reason ARESEP is now making everyone use meters (because, as I calculated it with a meter, the fare should really have only been coming out to $20 or perhaps $21 if there are some traffic delays). Ironically, if guys had been balking at taking cabs because they thought the rate was up to $26 or had even gotten stuck with that on their last trip, some might return to taking cabs if they believe the meter will keep their fare down to "only" $20 (still way too high for me). BTW, these new meter rates do not really represent a decrease from the old "official" rates. If you go to the ARESEP website, you'll find that these rates actually represent a 9.8% increase on the 1st km and a 13.3% increase on subsequent kms and/or delays versus the rates that were in force before (
ARESEP document on airport taxi fares see page 5).
Re: ATM fees. On your second correction, we've been over this several times before, so apparently you just don't get it. You keep ignoring the fact that most of us do NOT live in CR fulltime as you do (probably even more so if we're taking cabs from the airport and needing to get CR currency each time we arrive) and we do NOT do most of our banking in CR. We do NOT choose our banks based just on what it will save us on a one week trip a few times a year and our bank account's native currency is NOT in colones. And, even if we did and it was, "perfect" options like Scotia or BAC-San Jose simply do NOT exist where we live. ScotiaBank may be really big in CR (and Canada of course) but I'm pretty sure they do NOT have any branches in Florida let alone Tampa. Redbanc may be really big in South America but I'm willing to bet most of us here in the US have NOT even heard of it. Most banks in the US use multiregional networks like Cirrus, Maestro or PLUS and/or one or more of the more common North American networks such as Honor, Presto or STAR (which can also sometimes be found in CR). What you fail to realize is that, if your situation were more like the rest of us, you'd more or less be forced to use an ATM not owned by your home bank and most likely have to rely on one of these other interbank networks. You'd also have to do some sort of foreign exchange since your home account would be denominated in US dollars and the whole point of this exercise was to get local currency. In those situations, there is nearly always some charge that the bank passes on to us for the "foreign transaction" (in this case "foreign" meaning just any other bank) PLUS probably more charges for withdrawals denominated in a currency foreign to our US dollar based accounts.
MY point, which was probably lost in the ensuing discussion, was that
the need here is simply to get colones for the cab, not to take money out of your bank account, and bringing dollars to exchange (which you should have plenty of anyway this early in your trip) completely eliminates any possibility of getting hit with any extra bank fees
REGARDLESS of which bank you use.