Klockman wrote:
I'm guessing SL put a little heat on due to the much more accurate thread title this was posted under.
So this great hotel dealt with the complaints did they?
Klockman,
Please don't consider this a flame, as I don't tend to do that. I just wanted to respectfully suggest that you be a bit more careful in posting about matters of which you may not have all the facts.
When I saw that El Ciego changed the title of the thread, I assumed he did so as a gesture of goodwill, understanding that the original title might be misleading. I thought it was a classy move and showed a willingness on his part to admit that he might not have had all the facts when he originally posted. To suggest that he did so because "SL put a little heat on ..." is unfair to EC as it undermines his intentions to do the right thing, IMO.
By your own admission, you don't frequent SL. You also related Laura's comments about her beef with SL and Bill. She told me the same story over Labor Day, asked me to post about it and I told her 'no.' The story she related to me didn't pass the smell test, by a long shot, and I couldn't see giving it credence by posting it.
SL remains a special place for a lot of us, and simply reading a thread on its merits (or problems) can't really give a newcomer the sense of how it feels to walk in there and feel at home. Since you have trips booked, give it a whirl, and you will see why some folks get a little defensive when they see the place dissed. And when you're there, I'll buy you a beer and we can talk about doing Laura.
Ciaociao