I really do not have the time nor the energy to give this issue a complete dissertation and I though you will take the hint and stay out of the subject but here it goes;
WTF will you know? Have you ever been racially profile to your disadvantage?
Prolijo wrote:
I wouldn't characterize the HDR/BM pat-downs as an example of prejudice so much as basic racial profiling.
Make up your mind, it is or is not prejudice or more likely racist? Unless you are non-white, it will be very hard for you to see or understand. Not only you do not understand but you are trying to justify racism. Stay off the subject.
Prolijo wrote:
while you could say that there is an element of prejudice in racial profiling, you could just as easily say that there is also a rational basis in it as well.
And you know this because you read their minds? Again, talking without having the faint it of ideas while assuming a conclusion.
Prolijo wrote:
I seriously doubt that it reflects a belief on the part of the HDR security crew or its management that ALL hispanics or non-western blacks are somehow bad or not to be trusted or even most of them.
Sir, you may live there but you are still a visitor to their country and their culture. Do you actually believe that the CR economy is based on HDR? Do not try to justify ignorance on their part and passed for something else. This is just YOUR superiority complex speaking.
Prolijo wrote:
a) wealthy gringos are first and foremost where they make their money whereas chicas are just a tool toward that end and any local (and usually relatively poor) tico more often than not has no good reason to be in sych an expensive gringo-oruented bar
This is so high in the BS area and racist to boot that is hard to refute. I just going to said, any the data on this assumption?
Prolijo wrote:
b) wealthy gringos down in CR on vacation (and having gone through airport security) are much less likely to be carrying any serious weapons
I will hope so, even here in the USA that is true. Heard about the 2nd Amendment. Maybe they are learning something from us.
Prolijo wrote:
c) over time locals are much more likely to have been able to have acquired weapons somewhere and
This one really got me rolling. Let me tell you a secret, pssst, get close, it is a latino country, duh!
Prolijo wrote:
d) on the streets outside the HDR there have been very very few cases of gringo on gringo or gringo on tico violence involving weapons (if any at all), but latino on gringo or latino on latino armed attacks are a daily occurence.
Dude, you even making my point here. This happens on every country, white, black, Hispanic, Asian. Everything you quote or even hint at, it is a mix of the bable-caca that is communicated through the masses. Most of the so call prejudice that you are referring too is just ignorance of the masses. Either hang around with higher educated Hispanics or try to educate those that spew this garbage.
Prolijo wrote:
A much better example of hispanic on hispanic prejudice would be tico attitudes towards nicas and colombianos. The case of nicas in particular is analogous to the original example that Jazz cited regarding the french creole speaking Haitians in the Dominican Republic. In both cases, the prejudice is not so much racial or ethnically based as it is economic. In both cases you have economic (and usually illegal) migrants from a much poorer neighboring country coming in "stealing" jobs from locals through their willingness to work for much less money or overwhelming the already precarious social safety net or in the worst cases the criminal justice system. BTW, does that sound familiar to anything here in the US? Colombianos are a similar example except that they come from 2 countries away. Also with Colombianos there is a much closer association with narco-related violence and crime.
And how many different Latin countries have you live at? So again, spewing conclusions without any base.
Prolijo wrote:
CR is probably the one latin country where you would find the least of that.
Yeah, have you ever heard of Argentina or Chile? Dude, your ignorance of the subject is just amazing. We are all proud of our original country and are prejudice against others. That is life. Try to get a tica/tico to Mexico and you think the Mexicans will receive them with open arms, because they are “whiter� NOT!
Prolijo wrote:
Being "whiter" or more purely hispanic than many hispanics of neighboring countries and coming from a much more peaceful and economically successful country, they can often look down their noses at other hispanics.
The rest of the bable-caca on the post is just that, garbage. You are just perpetuating stereotypes and local prejudice. Your only grace and ray of hope for you is your last sentence.
Prolijo wrote:
In closing, IMHO this is not a hispanic phenomenon. There is a natural human tendency to align ourselves in groups (or tribes). Witness the phenomenon of sports fandom. Even if we didn't have racial, language or other cultural differences we would still find some other basis for dividing ourselves up.
Like, I said,
STAY OUT THIS SUBJECT!