Spock wrote:
TheMadGerman wrote:
TicoFan. Consider this. A single working girl with 3 K*ds likely has a lot more expenses than a single income family. She has to pay for babysitters, taxi fare to and from work (and a lot of times the girls may not find any work on any given night), they have to buy sexy clothes and perfume, condoms, makeup, etc...
Now, a typical single income family where the husband supports them, there is no need for any of that.
But you're comparing apples and oranges - How about a single "regular" tica with 3 K*ds ? Or are there NONE of those ???
Quote:
In my experience, most of the girls do NOT have higher than average lifestyles. They may have a 1 or 2 bedroom apartment with 3 K*ds. Many of the girls do not work every day as well (and probably a good thing too).

Huh ???
"Most of the girls" You mean hookers, right ? How can they NOT have a higher than average lifestyle if they're making at least 10 times what a "regular" job would pay ?
Sorry for quoting all of this, but I HAD NO ALTERNATIVE! (joke).
Seriously though, I have lived in San Jose for 3 years and have consorted (and fraternized) with many prostitutes. I have known (distantly) successful ones, and I have known many who barely scrape by. 10x average non-hooker income would be $2000 a month. Perhaps there are superstars who make 10k or more a month. But as far as even an average Del Rey girl making $2k a month, I just don't see it. The place is usually packed with girls and I would estimate that 70% are 7s and below. The girls I know well are in this group and are lucky to get 2 or 3 customers a week, for an average of about 40 dollars a pop. I have been to their houses. I know how they live. I'm talking about my friends, not the superstars. One in particular worked for a while as a part time receptionist for a dentist, but lost her job when he moved back to Mexico. She has 4 offspring and no help from the sperm donors, aka fathers. Does she have other options than prostitution? Yes. She could work as a store clerk for 200 a month, spend half of that on babysitters and no time with her Ch*ldren. Is that a better option? I think it's up to her to decide, not me.
There are certainly non-hookers making it in San Jose. I know some who get free babysitting from grandma or can ask a sister with a husband who actually has a job for a little money every month. Some get minimal Ch*ld support. Some have boyfriends who help out or even, gasp, husbands with jobs. Or husbands who sell drugs or steal.
If you think that a silicone enhanced Colombiana represents the average 'hooker' I have to disagree. To assume that the 7000 (or whatever the number is) sex workers in San Jose average $2k a month just isn't reality. Pointing at Paul McCartney and saying all bass players are rich just proves you don't know many bass players.
To take a more typical example I know personally, she is a 35ish flaca who is a great performer and decent, if not great looking. She supports her mother, 2 Ch*ldren and two sisters, none of whom know (or at least acknowledge) what she does for a living. She probably makes $400 a month on average but there are months when she can't pay her phone bill. She spends very little on 'outfits' and the like. She's been married three times, widowed once and divorced twice. She's trying to get her sister an education so she can get a decent job. Call her anything you like, but in my book she's a hard working, caring and honest person doing whatever it takes to make the most of her lot in life.
All hookers aren't so admirable. But I don't buy into the idea that all hookers have
better alternatives. Anyone who takes a realistic look at the girls inside the Del Rey can see that half of the girls won't make any money at all on a given night, and some of those probably won't average as much as one every three nights or more. The girls in Colombiana corner are not the rule, they are the exception.