Shawn4DelRey wrote:
Mrpublic wrote:
Ok I take that back, maybe you guys aren't anti-feminist, just pro-"gettin' it on".
But I feel like I'm missing something when you see "we ruined our women"... weren't women in the US much LESS sexually open in generations past? If that's what you're talking about then I feel like we've advanced.
The stuff about telling women what to do though, beyond what they want to for their own reasons or out of just being nice to us, that's the part you lose me on.
I was referring to American women being spoiled rotten by us . I wasn't talking about them being sexually open. Actually, I really don't ever think about them and sex at the same time.

Anyone who is old enough to have lived through the social revolution from the 50's 60's 70's and on knows that the so called womens movement destroyed the relationship in America. Women wanted more power, got it & then wanted more & more. Now they complain about men not being strong or assertive. Be careful what you wish for.
As far as women being less sexually open, I for one was a Hippie.
In the 60's & early 70's American girls were as easy to get as the Ticas of today. And it cost no dinero.
I feel in the 50's women put out because they thought it was their duty.
In the 60's 70's they put out more & more because they found that they
liked it. Then in the 80's & 90's they slowed the puttin out down to gain their Femanist power, up to today where they use sex as a too of power & MANipulation.
I for one will not tolerate this sex bartering in a relationship. That is why I do not do relationships. I want sex & now again a little companionship.
Nothing more. I have a few female friends that I do activitities with.(not sexo)
When I want sex I perfer P4P. In my experience when you phuck them you instantly loose the friend.
So I am voting in the Gringa's are useless column.
Stratone