Just to clarify where I was coming from, I'm guessing some people didn't follow the sequence or the logic behind my post...
ZIG implied, as many others have implied in the past, that ZIP is a troll who has actually never been to Costa Rica in his life and just talks alot of smack and crap, with no credibility or experience to back up his statements. ZIG implied this in his post where he stated to ZIP:
Zigmonger wrote:
...How many trips have you had....going on your virgin trip??? I will be glad to elucidate with you about my statement, once you have a little experience, and more perspective!!!
There have been quite a few people on the board that I have seen accuse ZIP or insinuate of ZIP, be it via pm's, personal conversations, and on posts on the public board, that he's a fulgazee. The conspiracy theories are endless, that he's really someone named costakid or some other quack from the past, that he has never set foot on CR, etc etc... There was even a time when members of the board were accusing Mucho Gusto of being ZIP!!! I took it upon myself to clear this matter once and for all, as it seemed to slighty rear it's ugly head there AGAIN for a second.
To qualify myself before defending ZIP, I just stated the fact that I DO EXIST (or do I?) and that many people know who I am and that I've been to CR, thus providing credibility when say ZIP exists and has been to CR many many times.
That was too complicated. What's the next rule?
Ruffnutz