Berk2302 wrote:
Quote:
Your point is well taken, it might be a stretch.
Quote:
I don't see where it is all that far fetched.
Make up your mind. Stretch.... yes, no, yes, no.

We are not talking the jungles of Colombia.

You have an over active imagination.
Quote:
One thing I think we can all agree is that Costa Ricans are somewhat cunning at taking advantage of easy opportunities.
Kidnapping is NOT one of them though. To imply that a local would even consider kidnapping a Ch*ld is ludicrous.
Berk....
Gee Berk, just a little argumentative tonight? If you were not part of the “better safe than sorryâ€, “why take the chance†crowd in the taxi debate than I apologize and I stand corrected.
I think if you READ my statements, you will see that I was referring specifically to kidnapping at one point, at another point I was discussing a wider variety of criminal opportunities or who the hell knows what else. If I was unclear, then I extend my most sincere apologies.
So let me get this straight, you think it is a good idea to have a puta involved in the care of his Ch*ld? After all that is the point. If you want to spend your time dissecting semantics’, have fun, but it is beside the point. Either it is a good idea, one where he should feel secure with his child’s safety or it is not. I personally would be VERY concerned if it was my daughter. Maybe some feel otherwise and I respect that, but I stand by my advice. I don’t think it is a very good idea. I can’t imagine any benefit to mixing those two things together.