Loco Mike wrote:
BashfulDwarf wrote:
Yup. The drug dealer was a businessman, not a serial killer. It's all about the money. I firmly believe he could have bought his way out of the situation. Of course, hindsight, and all that! easy to argue from the comfort of my chair.
Being the resident CRT blowhard it also easy for you to argue from a set of made up facts. Nobody who has posted on this thread knows for sure what happened. Your belief is based on nothing but pure speculation and conjecture, sort like 2/3 of your post just made up bs. How do you know he wanted to purchase drugs? How do you know he could have "bought his way out of the situation"? Your "hindsight" is based on what? You were not there. You have not spoken to anyone that was there. Do you know for sure what the argument was about? But you are the All Knowing Bashful Dwarf so you just know. Your a joke dude! Blame the victim with no evidence or facts to back you up just proves what a pathetic blowhard you really are. But for fate or luck you could be the one that died in that situation.
I don't suppose you read the story, did you? Obviously you did not based upon the crap you just threw up here. No one said he was buying drugs, but then your selective reading skills are so damned sharp, I cannot challenge them.
Why you attack me for nothing is beyond me. I said that he should have tried to buy peace rather than try to use brute force. Every narrative of the story says that he challenged the shooter. How many times on this board have you been told that when someone threatens you, you DO NOT challenge them? I seem to recall even the great Loco Mike chiming in his support on those threads when someone gets killed in a botched robbery.
No one is blaming the victim here. But it is clear that he could have tried some other way of dealing with the situation. Someone with your limited comprehension skills may not be able to understand that.
Have you tried Hooked On Phonics? Reading is Fundamental, ya kno'.