That was a good one, Prolijo, and i'll fire away while I still remember your 3 points. (Composed this offline in Word, so forgive if it goes amiss in some direction -- lost italics, smilies, etc..)
Women are competitive; they want what they can't have. So if they see you with another, you've passed the attractiveness test, and NOW they're interested.
Yes, CR gives us both the actual fallback, and the aura of "I don't need
you" That's what I was mentioning above, about playing with my expanded "chica aura".
And, “making fun†of them -- well, definitely don’t self-deprecate anymore -- Leykis is big on giving her insecurities another spin. Not sure I agree, closer to the middle ground. She’s looking for strength and confidence in you -- being A Man -- more than your two-edged sense of humor. I tended to overdo that before.
Now, it’s just STFU. If you stick your neck out enough, someone eventually, or often, is going to hand you your head as a reward. (My fault was doing that, and then not taking the nastiness as my clear signal to escape.) And we all know where nice guys finish, if they get to finish at all.
Prolijo, the post where you comment on the comments by Rolex and me doesn’t offer any solutions beyond “common senseâ€, “being yourselfâ€, and “moving to CRâ€. (All of which I agree with, BTW.) Leykis is an entertainer, focused on HIS bottom line, but he’s gotten there by speaking some truths, and the main one I could throw in here is that, from the decades of anti-male propaganda (which we’ve internalized) in the good ol’ USA, we be F*#&ED trying to go after gringa females with any great chance at success and satisfying relationships. Something CRT members have gathered together to acknowledge, and adapt to. So -- that's our starting point, and we ain't gonna change it in our lifetimes.
In fact, Leykis has sworn off US women and prefers Latinas. (And Steele married one, age 22 to his 62, in L.A.) Who knows what Leykis actually does, off-air, but the attitude, while overplayed, is perhaps deliberately provocative as a corrective to what we’re actually living in. I would say “misogynistic jerk†is the publicity hook, but if you stop there, well, what does that say? The more intelligent listener can pick and choose -- and learn. He makes me think of the coaching fathers do not give their sons -- are afraid to, in fact.
Hell, why didn’t I listen to those Italian toughguys in H.S. who warned us against getting p***y-whipped? (No one else did!) .Two decades wasted. Of my supposedly “real†life. Coulda used a little misogyny myself, to lean against the romantic idiot who thought plunging into quicksand was such a great idea. Leykis didn't really stumble on to that message until less than a decade back, after his 4th marriage.
Anyway, I haven’t read the “materials†or “techniques†you’re describing, if you have, and actually CR has been more of a dodge to doing my own homework than I’d previously admitted, so that’s pretty much what hooked me about this thread -- wanting to aim at getting more solid where I am.
I think you would find Steele more to your liking. And, more targeted to those of us whose age has removed us from the bar/singles scene, but who still "always get it up for the touch of the younger kind" -- ("My My My Sharona").
Video store: Ah, you nailed it on #2. “flattered†but “no real interestâ€. Exactly! And I was not “really†pursuing her, just playing with the “chemistry of interest,†and she responded exactly the best I could have expected. Enjoying my attraction, and me staying on top of the wave that might bring me to a real possibility on a good day.
Remember -- our age and appearance ARE real factors, will be more so the rest of our lives, and I can’t change that -- only my attitude. I know that 9 out of 10 women under 30 are not interested. So I don’t torture myself over it, and I don’t expend vital energy. (It’s just like a walk through the BM after a good MP session!, dig?) It's called flirting, and it's been going on for 100's of 1000's of years, but I've only caught on lately.
OK, there you go -- in the paragraphs following, you outline very well the odds and priorities one must have. Yes, the 15% is real, and yes, 6s and 7s are the target zone, and yes, you have to be in your best shape and dress well (something you CAN have some control over -- women can forgive baldness better than a bad comb-over, can’t they?
But to say you might as well wait until you go back to CR (something my next two pre-purchased tickets have fully targeted) is to say “forget about any in-betweensâ€. (Hey, bro, remember, I’m just back two days, so I’m full of optimism -- you know how that works, I’ll bet. I tend to slip pretty low when things dry up; don’t even wanna think about it.)
Prolijo, I think your response to J.Joe is right on, though pessimistic-sounding (don't hear "wrong" in that), and I remember agreeing with his when I read it (hours ago), but all I can say is “Read Steele†and you’ll see the same kind of intelligent, reasoned, FEASIBLE thinking that YOU put into all of your writing. (It’s the practice that’s hard, and here I’ll ‘fess up to using CR as my shortcut -- so I admit speaking theory is not anyplace to argue from, which I'm not, so I'm just saying the thinking is something I think you’d appreciate.)
I think he says that the rollercoaster ride of an affair with a young gringa (like the Latina amusement park we describe here) is worth one's optimal effort. But, as here at CRT, knowledge is a pre-requisite.
Prolijo -- your last one there about “teasing†shows a good sense of finesse, sort of the template for all these difficult situations we’re talking about here. Remember, I’m only a guy talking about what he’s read for a few years, had a few glimmers of confirmation, and seems to fit with my own ideas of evolutionary biology (and what I see the animals in my backyard doing occasionally

For example, those clothes piled on my treadmill...
And to KS, remember the “third way†between the CR girls and the gringas-- the indy pros around town -- making friends with them has helped me keep myself sane to where I might imagine making those minimal but optimal efforts at the ascent of Volcan Gringa. And CR has given me new perspective on how to relate to them. (More of a spectrum of involvement, than an either/or.)
JJ -- the question about age -- for anyone who’s raised daughters, “descending†to the legal age of 18 can be a pain in the ass, old buttons quickly pushed, even if it happened (though I must confess to being in the process of cultivating one right now, for more than a year -- interesting person to know, either way, so I don't push. "She chooses YOU -- always.")
Steele outlines the annual stages of a young woman’s life very astutely -- how she sees the world, and what she is looking for. Her maturity in being able to date A Man doubles about every year, from 18 on through 25. So, early 20s is really the sweet spot. And the post-divorce 35+ ,and 45+ bitter feministas is another desert to stay out of, for several good reasons. (Yes, better to hit Travelocity for SJO ticket, than Match.com for a bitter gordita)
Courting the early 20s, for a mutually-satisfying relationship is an art/science that many attest can be done. However, the prejudice in the US against over-50s men (she will have to hide you from friends, family, and boyfriends) in this, tilts the game back logically toward CR (and other vacation spots worldwide) for optimal results. We wouldn’t be talking here if it weren’t so.
The market price is higher in the US -- for everything -- it's where we make our money. And now we’re finding it worthwhile to outsource our needs to a lower-cost country. No surprise there.
Still, no saying you can’t play the Great Game -- wherever you are! Take pride in playing your best -- and play to win.
Now -- excuse me while I go “pimp my padâ€. Never know when a hottie will want to come over and take a dip in The Grotto
