www.CostaRicaTicas.com https://forum.costaricaticas.com/ |
|
older review https://forum.costaricaticas.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=42078 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Mr.Black [ Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | older review |
http://www.bootsnall.com/articles/09-01 ... asino.html please note this review is over three years old and not scuba1 approved |
Author: | DGD [ Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: older review |
I don't know where that "medical card" thing ever started in the first place, but I've read it from different sources a hundred times over the years. |
Author: | Hank [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:10 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: older review |
I haven't stayed at HDR in a long time but the chica fee is now $11. So this article must have been written 10 years ago?? |
Author: | Scuba1 [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: older review |
DGD wrote: I don't know where that "medical card" thing ever started in the first place, but I've read it from different sources a hundred times over the years. Hank wrote: I haven't stayed at HDR in a long time but the chica fee is now $11. So this article must have been written 10 years ago?? Just 2 of the <many> inconsistencies/just plain wrong info contained in this article - I guess it was interesting as a "nostalgia" piece, but why bother to post something dated, with wrong info as to hotel pricing, girl pricing, health cards, guest fees, et al; written by - lets be kind - a newbi -with zero commentary other than a link - looking at the link, shows "09-01". Not getting down on you, Mr Black (well, maybe just a little ![]() |
Author: | Lee [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 2:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: older review |
Just for the sake of accuracy: The article may have been 11 years old. But the pictures were not. The photographs were taken in the last few years. Not 100% on this but the photograph of the girl was taken probably at the President not at the DR. And oh yes this little piece of heaven has six levels not seven. Lee |
Author: | Mr.Black [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: older review |
@scuba gave the disclaimer of older review thought the date was jan 09 the new info i can give is 55+ tax for a standard room om 11/8/12 ![]() |
Author: | Scuba1 [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: older review |
Look, I always appreciate anyone posting but the incorrect room pricing was just one one example of wrong info contained in that particular article - if you read it again, you will see what I'm refering to, or look again at my previous post - again, b/c the place is so well known, we don't want guys reading something where so much of what's written is outdated or just plain wrong - that was my point ![]() |
Author: | Mr.Black [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: older review |
I'LL ADD another disclaimer "read at your own risk" |
Author: | Scuba1 [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 8:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: older review |
![]() ![]() ![]() Or how about "a ton of the info is dated, or just plain incorrect" ![]() |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |