www.CostaRicaTicas.com

Welcome to the #1 Source for Information on Costa Rica
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 7:19 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 6:52 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 2:33 pm
Posts: 1617
Seabee wrote:
From a recent thread. You ought to read it all. Pretty much what the OP said he was going to do and you're trying to talk him out of it. I've seen many cedulas and very few actually look like the girl. They constantly change their looks from hair style, color, etc. If it walks like a duck........

(BangBang57 wrote:
Those of us who have been in this game for a few years, especially here in Costa Rica have a saying: "If she looks too young (under 21) and there is any doubt at all about her cedula, RUN!!!!

Orange wrote:
Exactly. There is one sure fire way to avoid this nonsense. Don't pick up young looking chicas. And don't say that even if they look older, they can still be young. Ummmm, NO! Every last one of us can tell when a chica is definitely not a minor. Yes, she may be 26 or 28, but you will be sure. God forbid!
If you want teens, keep in mind that security and staff at most hotels do a piss poor job of actually verifying a cedula. You are basically taking a risk.)


I'm convinced. No more chicas, ever!

Can't believe the cedula we're supposed to check, check!

Stay home and watch granny porn (remember Traci Lords!).

_________________
Any opinion or observation in the post above is purely presented for entertainment purposes and does not promote "sexual tourism" or "human trafficking". The laws of Costa Rica apply to all activities in Costa Rica. No warranty is expressed or implied. Void where prohibited by law. Your experience, observations or perspective may be different.

In exile in pu*sy prison


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:38 pm 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:26 pm
Posts: 808
Jawanker wrote:
Ah, here we go again. Maybe express321 is Greengo. :roll:


Wanker go wank yourself, is probably your forte anyway.... :D :x Address the message not the messenger or else stay on the sidelines. This is an important issue that obviously needed to be visited. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:42 pm 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:26 pm
Posts: 808
MM3 wrote:
So, to recap:

1. We cannot believe the cedula because they have a fake one or borrowed someone's or whatever.

2. We should ask to see the cedula, which even if it says they are of age is fake or someone else's.

3. Every place is infested with und***ge chicas and you can't believe the cedula you've asked to see (and the truth is that done of us is Dick Tracy or CSI: San Jose and probably couldn't spot a fake good enough to fool the 'doorman' security under any circumstances anyway).

Yup. No more. Just stay home crnewbie903 - it's the only responsible thing to do.


Nice hyperbole fuckface, but is the exact opposite of the overly lax hyperbole in the other direction that you presented. Be careful out there is the correct message folks. Vertifying age is YOUR responsibility.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:50 pm 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:26 pm
Posts: 808
P.S.

I`m of the opinion that there`s vermin in forums like this that could care less about age restrictions. That`s as long as the chica claims to be of age and they guy can claim that someone PROBABLY checked some ID or an excuse for an ID somewhere along the way. Like this Whitecat twit that bragged about forcing an "18 year old" at VIPs to quit after her first day, and when asked if he checked ID, we never got an answer. Call it what you want, but something to think about folks. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:54 pm 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:26 pm
Posts: 808
nosejelly wrote:
Express321 wrote:
And as an aside, is this MM3 the latest incarnation of Sirlm, the guy that chirps on and on self styling himself as an expert on everything then throws a crying fit when someone questions his reasoning? I`m honestly not sure but is food for thought. He just never has been satisfied talking to himself over in the other forum... :wink:


Kinda sounds like you are describing yourself. Pot meet Kettle.
:roll:


What is "nosejelly" anyway? Struck me the first time I saw it, and I know it can`t be good. How about enlighten us, or to be more blunt, what the Phuck is wrong with you? :lol: :roll:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 8:01 pm 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:26 pm
Posts: 808
sil8822 wrote:
Don't know about you guys but the chica always gives me shit when I ask to see her cedula :


Then move on. NEXT. Oppportunites are endless.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:31 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 2:33 pm
Posts: 1617
Express321 wrote:
MM3 wrote:
So, to recap:

1. We cannot believe the cedula because they have a fake one or borrowed someone's or whatever.

2. We should ask to see the cedula, which even if it says they are of age is fake or someone else's.

3. Every place is infested with und***ge chicas and you can't believe the cedula you've asked to see (and the truth is that done of us is Dick Tracy or CSI: San Jose and probably couldn't spot a fake good enough to fool the 'doorman' security under any circumstances anyway).

Yup. No more. Just stay home crnewbie903 - it's the only responsible thing to do.


Nice hyperbole fuckface, but is the exact opposite of the overly lax hyperbole in the other direction that you presented. Be careful out there is the correct message folks. Vertifying age is YOUR responsibility.


Thank you. You have verified that you are an arrogant asshole.

_________________
Any opinion or observation in the post above is purely presented for entertainment purposes and does not promote "sexual tourism" or "human trafficking". The laws of Costa Rica apply to all activities in Costa Rica. No warranty is expressed or implied. Void where prohibited by law. Your experience, observations or perspective may be different.

In exile in pu*sy prison


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:34 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 2:33 pm
Posts: 1617
Express321 wrote:
P.S.

I`m of the opinion that there`s vermin in forums like this that could care less about age restrictions. That`s as long as the chica claims to be of age and they guy can claim that someone PROBABLY checked some ID or an excuse for an ID somewhere along the way. Like this Whitecat twit that bragged about forcing an "18 year old" at VIPs to quit after her first day, and when asked if he checked ID, we never got an answer. Call it what you want, but something to think about folks. :D


So, why are you here?

_________________
Any opinion or observation in the post above is purely presented for entertainment purposes and does not promote "sexual tourism" or "human trafficking". The laws of Costa Rica apply to all activities in Costa Rica. No warranty is expressed or implied. Void where prohibited by law. Your experience, observations or perspective may be different.

In exile in pu*sy prison


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:35 pm 
I can do CR without a wingman!
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 12:02 am
Posts: 199
The bottom line is you and only you are ultimately responsible that your not with an und***ge chica. It's best to be sure and if something tells you something isn't right it probably isn't and leave. No one is going to take the ride for you to jail. And as Express said the defense of Someone else was responsible to check I.D's is Ludacris. To believe it would be a viable defense is equally Ludacris. They may simply say "I'm sorry" and nothing else.

Sorry crnewbie this turned into a slugfest. Your questions were valid. Enjoy yourself and be careful and always remember your responsible for your own actions and no one else's.

Peace!

_________________
nicarica


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 11:37 pm 
Masters Degree in Mongering!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 12:53 am
Posts: 634
Location: Bull in China Shop
Express321 wrote:
nosejelly wrote:

Kinda sounds like you are describing yourself. Pot meet Kettle.
:roll:


What is "nosejelly" anyway? Struck me the first time I saw it, and I know it can`t be good.


If you say "it can't be good" then all the k*ds on the playground will think it can't be good! Because your word is God. Oh please please please Mr. Keyboard Cool Guy, tell everyone you were just messing around and didn't mean it! Pleeeeeeeeeaaaasssse!
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
If you see me at the bottom, please bring me my running shoes!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2016 3:08 am 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:26 pm
Posts: 808
nosejelly wrote:
Express321 wrote:
nosejelly wrote:

Kinda sounds like you are describing yourself. Pot meet Kettle.
:roll:


What is "nosejelly" anyway? Struck me the first time I saw it, and I know it can`t be good.


If you say "it can't be good" then all the k*ds on the playground will think it can't be good! Because your word is God. Oh please please please Mr. Keyboard Cool Guy, tell everyone you were just messing around and didn't mean it! Pleeeeeeeeeaaaasssse!
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


Don`t know what you are talking about. Just wanted to know what "nosejelly" is. I you don`t want to share im cool with that...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2016 3:10 am 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:26 pm
Posts: 808
nicarica wrote:

Sorry crnewbie this turned into a slugfest. Your questions were valid. Enjoy yourself and be careful and always remember your responsible for your own actions and no one else's.

Peace!


Well said.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2016 3:36 am 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:26 pm
Posts: 808
MM3 wrote:
Express321 wrote:

So, why are you here?


It`s you who has essentially mocked anyone who takes an serious interest in verifying age in San jose. You tell us that all these 14 year olds have been knocked up by tattoed boyfriends and are out working the streets. Phuck you are your stereotypes. I mean serisously, up your ass sideways, back and forth. YOU are the piece of shit so own it, man up and walk away with it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:27 am 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 2:33 pm
Posts: 1617
Express321 wrote:
MM3 wrote:
Express321 wrote:

So, why are you here?


It`s you who has essentially mocked anyone who takes an serious interest in verifying age in San jose. You tell us that all these 14 year olds have been knocked up by tattoed boyfriends and are out working the streets. Phuck you are your stereotypes. I mean serisously, up your ass sideways, back and forth. YOU are the piece of shit so own it, man up and walk away with it.


Actually, besides repeatedly falsely misrepresenting my repeated statement to check the cedula - the cedula that you say cannot be trusted - you have been repeatedly (and falsely) insinuating that I am actively seeking und***ge sex workers.

Only one of us is obsessed with und***ge sex workers - and it isn't me.

And your personal attacks show you are incapable of anything other than being unpleasant. Climb back into your sad life.

_________________
Any opinion or observation in the post above is purely presented for entertainment purposes and does not promote "sexual tourism" or "human trafficking". The laws of Costa Rica apply to all activities in Costa Rica. No warranty is expressed or implied. Void where prohibited by law. Your experience, observations or perspective may be different.

In exile in pu*sy prison


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Hotel Amistad vs SL
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:13 am 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:26 pm
Posts: 808
MM3 wrote:
Actually, besides repeatedly falsely misrepresenting my repeated statement to check the cedula -


:lol: You are a liar, and I encourage anyone who doubts it to re-read your post that I initially responded to. Right after you mention checking the cedula you add that the chica must be some sort of "internatinal mastermind" in order to fool you. You then go on preaching about the benefits of ID scanners without any mention of their glaring limitations. Then you conclude your rosey assessment by asserting that all und***ge working girls in town have been knocked up by age 14 and are out hustling the streets. Anyone who listens to you therefore has no reason to worry... :roll: :P We know you want to backpeddle but it`s too late to redeem yourself.

MM3 wrote:
the cedula that you say cannot be trusted - you have been repeatedly (and falsely) insinuating that I am actively seeking und***ge sex workers.


And you are lying again. :D Yes, I do believe guys who are okay with doing und***ge hang out in these circles. I do think you are someone that needs to do a lot more listening than talking, but you may or may not be interested in und***ge.

MM3 wrote:
Only one of us is obsessed with und***ge sex workers - and it isn't me.


The issue is the safety of the gentlemen on this board in the matter of cedulas in contrast to your glib, asinine, and sterotypical pronouncements. You`re really getting deperate here and frankly that`s great to see.... :lol: :roll: 8)

MM3 wrote:
And your personal attacks show you are incapable of anything other than being unpleasant. Climb back into your sad life.


I think this discussion was beneficial. We confirmed yet again reasonable strategies in the matter of the cedula. Responding to your arrogance just provided us the lanching pad. Thanks for sharing. :D :wink:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hank and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group