Irish Drifter wrote:
For example something that would have to be repaired, if found at at an airport that the airline had a main maintenance base, before the flight could depart might not have to repaired before the flight departed an airport where the airline had only a line maintenance facility.
I assumed all airlines have a list like this. But if that airport did not have the proper maintenance equipment/staff, that plane should have been flown (
without passengers) to a another airport for repair. But I understand the economic ramifications of that kind of move. And sometimes economics, and not common sense, dictate corporate action.
Irish Drifter wrote:
What a go no go list does not take into account are things like a runway without proper safety grooves and rain at the time of landing.
I think you hit it right on the head, the rain (and lack of proper draining) was the key. As far as I know, airplanes do not have anti-lock braking systems, so without reverse thrust, he had to use the brakes and spoilers only. As far as I know, you can't reverse thrust on one side only (I could be wrong on that). In any case, once he locked the brakes, he began sliding (hydroplaning) down the runway because of the excessive water buildup.
I'm curious to see the final report of who they blame for this, if anybody.