BashfulDwarf wrote:
Miamiheller wrote:
Zunbake3 wrote:
A common language for an entire country is very important for the cohesiveness (and strength) of a country.
Having four national languages doesn't seem to have hurt Switzerland much.
Or Miami for that matter.
mh
This is true, but to be fair, Switzerland (ignoring finance) isn't much of anything on the world stage.
Well, if being "something on the world stage" is the measuring stick, then agreed. The correlation between one common language and economic/sociopolitical dominance is certainly present in empires of the past. But one wonders if it was a consequence of dominance rather than a cause.
Quote:
Now, it is up to Zunbake to show a correlation between this apathy and the multi-language situation. But I think a case can be made. Though I have not been there, I am told that there are different 'regions' where the local language is dominant. This could be a potential issue in preserving unity in some situations.
Canada is a case in point. You have two dominant cultures + languages, regional differences, and the locals are at each others throats... er wait, they're Canadians! Much more civilized behavior up there.
Quote:
As for Miami, the Miami of old has been destroyed. Torn down and replaced by the equivalent of an invasion force.
Was there ever such a thing as "Miami of old"? I would argue Miami became relevant on the international stage precisely because of the changes brought by the invasion force.
When it comes to the pros and cons of multilingualism, I'm solidly in the "pros" camp. But of course I'm biased. If I only spoke one language, then I might think differently.
mh