www.CostaRicaTicas.com

I hear what you are saying Pacifica...and have had some of those "puppies". But I have also been fortunate enough to see long term "mates" in my family and circle who truly have the lifelong thing going on...and they are very happy and content with that. In general, for whatever the reasons, most of us are in pursuit of a "mate". The dating game, and after while, the mongering game...seems to come up short if thats all we have relationally going on. Even some of my past turbulent "romances" with regular women far outweigh in my memory and have affected my life more positively than any of my short term mongering "trists". And now I am happily going on 6 years with a wonderful 40 something Colombiana who continues to treat me like she always has...royalty. In return...she is also my queen. Thats how I think it is supposed to work...if one can find the right one to make that happen with. But, you cant make someone into something they are not.

_________________
All that a man achieves and all that he fails to achieve is the direct result of his own thoughts...

That is such a great point.

HEY GUYS! Lets face, if we were a segment of the population that is highly successful in relationships, we wouldn't be down there in the gulch in the first place.

I know I am no prize. My women in my real world relationships spared no effort in pointing out my various short comings. I don't put myself above anyone else, but hell, I have seen what the rest of you guys are like. (With a couple of exceptions) You are all a bunch of dogs, myself included.

I don't know about you guys, but these days I'm just happy when I have a relationship that lasts an hour with a woman and it goes well.

-PA

_________________
-PA*

Amen to that.

_________________
[url=http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/]

Good point PA . The problems begin when some of us translate that hour of "bliss" into thinking we can "own" that tang...or fall in love with it.

Hows this for a new analogy or thought about why some of us are so non traditional in pursuing sex and women...

Perhaps many of our profiles psychologically are those of "warriors", adventurers, extreme hunters. It is hard for our type to settle down and be accountable to one woman or a family just by our nature. We want love, but we dont want the traditions and "cage" that comes with. So, we are continually off to war or exploring, leaving friends and family behind in our pursuits of personal fulfillment and adventure. Other types of males choose to stay in the homeland, play the game, and live up to that type of traditional role. And many of them obviously prefer that to the more sporting life some of us lead. I think these distinctions have been going on for milleniums with warriors and explorers going off to the wild blue yonder while the "statemen" types stay home, have the Babi*s and maintain a career. Just a thought...

_________________
All that a man achieves and all that he fails to achieve is the direct result of his own thoughts...

Making a lot of sense there T-man..........

should know that this profession is not quite as villified in many other cultures as it is our own and for the most part the girls are no worse than the sluts you've picked up in bars in the states. Just a bit sweeter and alot hotter!
_________________
Good stuff Shawn

And what about all those gringa actresses and singers, they've been whores since the "talkies" and the typical guy and guy thinks they are GREAT and the working Tica in CR is a hoe. Get real.

I really don't see what makes us (any of us) any different than the whores, or better for that matter. We are all whores too. We engage in sex for money, it is just that we are on the other side of the transaction.

If fact, I would go so far to say for a good many of the puta thier reasons for engaging in the sex trade are a far more noble than any of ours. Many, if not most, do it to support Ch*ldren. We participate in the sex trade for our own personal gratification. Yet somehow some of us find it in us to feel superior. We pat ourselves on the back for being respectful to these women. Who do we think we are?

We are not superior. Not at all, not as far as I am concerned. I love my putas. God bless all of them.

let us mourn these poor men

_________________
"With foxes, we must play the fox." ~ Thomas Fuller

We engage in sex for money, it is just that we are on the other side of the transaction.
_______________
Kccostrica



I've tried to be on the other side of the transaction Kc, believe me, but no luck, NONE, I couldn't get a chimp to give up half a banana for my hairy ass.

I love this. I suppose if I were to weigh in I would challenge the support for the Ch*ldren part. It's more complicated than this, but you may know this. What I like is the attack on smugness. I have zero qualms about the participants on either side, but loathe the attitudes that can arise from either. The monger sense of superiority may be the worst, and I end up rooting for the putas who nail them.

The key word is many. I am speculating that it it most. You are right it is complicated. Lets not K*D ourselves, some are thieves, some are morally bankrupt and some would slice your throat for an extra 10,000c.

Many are very fine women and in tough situations. In general, I think the MP women are a nicer bunch. They are more concerned about their reputations and thus work in a more private environment for less pay rather than risk being seen out in public with their Johns.

I think a lot of us (Americans) get phucked up because we think of sex as a morality issue. There is nothing immoral about engaging in sex. Of all the people that should understand this, it should be us. In reality we are just about as phucked up on this as everyone else.

Interestingly, the word Lust was derived from the word Luxor (sp?). Luxor was #1 of the seven deadly sins. It means to live in undue opulence and is associated with greed and over indulgence. Nowhere in the seven deadly sins is their any mention of sex. The word Lust was a fabrication to associate sex with sin and incorporate it into the seven deadly sins, when sex was never thought of in that context previously.

Also interesting, the passage in the bible that is derogatory about homosexuality lists several sins ahead of it, including greed and gluttony. Yet you don’t see the Rich Fat Christian Preaches rallying the congregations against those “sins”. Hypocracy knows no limits.

(Okay guys, sorry, just a few too many drinks and a little off topic)