We talk here, and salute the fact that the ultimate decision to do anything or pay whatever amount we want is our decision at the end of the day, so that when we bounce a chica or get a good deal we are exercising out power over them, and establishing our authority over the situation. Ok, true enough.
That being said, who here hasn't seen a chica reject a client too? Whether for money or for the perceived potential unpleasant experience I've seen several chicas walk away from what would normally be a good offer.
We worry about the quality of the experience for the price. is it reasonable to assume that the chica does the same and that it's hit and miss for both parties?
lastly, as we of this board, and as a group of men in general,are so pleased to say, we are better informed than the vast majority of over-paying, know-nothing gringos, but we are for all that a fairly small minority in the grand scheme of things, and even we get taken occasionally, as the many stories here will attest to. If we are not being "taken" then it's fair to say that many of us have in fact paid more than we wanted to at one point or another because the little head did the talking when the big head should have said start walking.
so, in the grand scheme of things, if we follow this logic ( and many will disagree,or say "but I...") wouldn't it be reasonable to say that most of the time, and with most guys (aforementioned dumb gringos) that the chicks are the ones running the show, or at least exercising a larger degree of comtrol than many of us give them credit for?
of course, this isn't to say that there's some kind of international chica conspiracy...
I don't think.
