Thirdworld wrote:
ID, do you think the severe penalties are going to hold up? I read the other day that someone had challenged drunk driving in the Sala iv,because alcoholism is a sickness not a crime... Sounds silly, but ya know where we are.
I read about that appeal also but last I heard the supreme court had not decided on whether to accept the case. I would not like to see them rule that because alcoholism is a disease you can drive impaired. I would like to see a couple of changes though. (1) I think the .075 for drunk driving is low. (2) as far as I know they only submit you to a portable breathalyzer and do not do a follow up with either a full scale breathalyzer or blood alcohol level test. I doubt that they have very strict procedures for calibrating the portable machines. Given the low threshold, lack of more accurate follow up testing and unknown quality of the initial test equipment it is possible that someone could spend a couple of years in jail, lose his car, destroy his life and not really be impaired. I support the concept but think the enforcement procedures and penalties are flawed.
As to the fines for other offenses they are just way out of whack. 300 or 400 hundred dollars for no seat belt, driving with your interior light on, having a 4"6", 125lb, 11 year 8 month Ch*ld NOT in a Ch*ld restraint seat? These are just a few of the ridiculous things that carry draconian financial penalties. I think they really need to be looked at and made more reasonable. Granted the old fines were insufficient to get people to obey the law but the new ones are overkill.
_________________

Pura Vida

Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four
essential food groups:
alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat.
Alex Levine
