Fuzebox wrote:
Prolijo wrote:
Fuzebox wrote:
Shrug, maybe I misinterpreted, maybe I didn't. All I know is, almost every post in this thread I've read of yours seemed unrealistic and uninformed. This poor guy just got kidnapped and robbed by the police and all you can to is criticize the amount of money in his wallet.
I think you missed the fact that that was the only part of your multi paragraph rant I had a problem with, that's why I addressed it

Got nothing against the rest of what you said, so I have nothing to say. There's no way I'm going to go point for point with you on several pages of text on a topic I don't even care about.
I just read, and if I see a point I have a problem with, I address it. That'd be why I only quoted the specific sentence in question

...
I know I said I that would be my "last attempt to try and clarify what I've been trying to say or in trying to defend myself on the matter." However, you're raising an entirely new matter here beyond the original issues of TMG, cops and passports, that being how or why I'm defending myself. So I'll rise to the bait, make an exception to my previous vow while trying to keep my uninformed, unrealistic multi-paragraph rant short enough for you. And then I'll return underneath my rock.
Unlike you, because your post was so much shorter, I didn't have to selectively quote you. So there is no danger of my taking you out of context and I couldn't have missed any "facts". You clearly said that
"ALL" I could do was criticize him on that one point. And that suggests to me that the ONLY reason that was the
"ONLY" part of my "rant" that you had a problem with was because in your view I wasn't writing about anything else. In other words, you didn't selectively quote because you didn't have a problem with other parts of my posts. You selectively quoted because, in your view, the entire post was all about just that one same narrow issue.
Furthermore, ALL that YOU were doing was criticizing ME for finding some faults with TMG. I did use the "idiot" word when referring to guys who walk around the Gulch at 2AM with $200 in their wallets. Mea Culpa. But in all other respects, my "critiques" were offered in a constructive way and I was civil and conciliatory, acknowledging his difficult situation after being coerced into the car and driven to a bad neighborhood AND offering my sympathies for that. You on the other hand are throwing out adjectives like unrealistic, uninformed rants and weren't even acknowledging that there was more to what I was saying. If I am flaming here as some people have suggested then what are you doing as well?
Was that brief enough for you? Okay, I'll crawl back under my rock now.