Haywood Jablommi wrote:
I think corporate dictatorship would be a more accurate description.
I know how extreme that may sound to some but think about who controls the media, the food, armaments, transportation, drugs ( both medical and recreational) and oil and marvel at the unprecedented power over the people of the Earth and Earth itself.
Just like to point out that the guys that started microsoft, oracle, ben and jerry's, hp, cellular one, google, walmart, mcdonalds, napster, apple, marriott, yahoo and a lot of other companies were just regular people with an idea. Tell me how that fits into any corporate dictatorship (not really sure what a corporate dictatorship is really, to be honest). Many of our big businesses today were once just small businesses. The USA recognized a long time ago that small businesses turn into big business so this is why we have loan facilities of all types to help small businesses grow.
I can't really speak to the FED, it is a central bank and those things exist all over the world, don't they? Are they all messed up or just ours? I'm not smart enough to comment really.
So what do we do folks? Continue as we always have hoping that the big wheels figure this thing out or are regular people smart enough to protest for a change. I don't think any of us regular folks know what to ask for. Heck, many regular folks had no idea they couldn't afford a mortgage payment that was going to increase 50% in two years.
Too many regular folks living off credit so they probably feel they have little advice to offer since they are not living any different than the US Gov't.... buy it today, pay next month and the month after that. A whole new attitude needs to take hold in households and in the gov't.
I think we are in a crisis, but not that bad. As long as the bailouts are in the billions, I think we are fine (I could be wrong). Why do I feel this way, because when the gov't budget deficit is 400 billion for just one year, no one blinks. It is what it is. No big deal and it hasn't been a big deal for a long time, many many many years there have been deficits.
Is offering up an 80 billion dollar bailout any different than a 400 billion dollar budget deficit? I'm ask, because I really don't know. Both the 80 and the 400 boils down to owing money to someone so I don't see them as any different. 400 makes 80 seem like a drop in the bucket.