I think the US, much more than any other country, has become a "Nation of Fear". I don't know if it is because of anything inherent in our national psyche or whether it is something either created or at least fed by such institutions as the media and the government, but it is there.
News stories focus on crime and violence to the point of oversaturation. Sure there really is plenty of crime and violence out there, but if you were to base it on what you see on the news one would think that we were all at risk of getting mugged or murdered every day and yet the vast majority of us aren't. So many of us feeling this fear rush out and buy guns to protect ourselves. Why don't people in other industrialized nations feel the same need to arm themselves? A girl goes missing in Aruba or a K*D shoots a dozen people at a school and it gets covered non-stop for 24 hours or 24 days until the next sensational story comes along. The next thing you know, we're afraid to travel to the Carribean or afraid to send our K*ds to school. Nevermind that Aruba has a much much lower crime rate than the US or that millions of schoolchildren go to school everyday without ever having some ostracised K*D coming in to shoot them all up with an automatic weapon. Never mind that the far greatest risk that any of us probably face is from the accumulated damage of a lifetime of consuming the junk food and/or greenhouse gas emitting products that the sponsors of those TV programs brainwash us into buying.
And the government is just as bad. I'm sure I'll catch a lot of flack on this but am I the only one who thinks that the government is overplaying the risks we face from terrorism? Sure it was a horrible horrible thing that happened on 9/11 and we should do everything we reasonably can to prevent it from happening again. But far far more people die every year in this country from cancer and heart disease, car accidents and such than have ever died in all the terrorist attacks in the 6 years since 9/11 or the 6 years before (BTW, Bush likes to point out that there have been no islamic terrorist attacks on US soil in the 6 years since 9/11 but there weren't any attacks for the 6 years prior to 9/11 either, so what does that prove?). The terrorists get lucky once and kill 2974 people in the US, far more than they had ever hoped, and we send 3781 (so far) of our soldiers to die in a country that didn't even have a hand in the original attack. And after sacrificing all those soldiers lives, the action has if anything made us less sfe than we were before.
Aren't we playing into the terrorist hands by elevating the importance of catching a few bumbling Osama wannabes in Buffalo hatching a plot that probably wouldn't have succeeded anyway, or coincidentally raising some silly colored alert rating system in the days right before an election. I think we give the terrorists more credit than they're due and in doing so foster the very terror that they are trying to acheive. So why do we put so much emphasis on fighting terrorism, while doing relatively nothing to deal with the other equally or greater threats to our health and safety?
The only thing I can think of is that scaring people by trumping up a threat (whether it is non-existent WMD's and Al-Queda in pre-invasion Iraq or now the patently absurd idea that insurgents trying to liberate their country from an occupying force and/or trying to settle scores with rival clans will have any interest at all in following those retreating occupiers back to their country) stirs up the Republican's natural pro-security base and acts as a good justifier for increased spending for the US's huge military-industrial complex.
But, as you all know, I can go on and on. So what's my point? Go to the US State Department website and read the travel warning section and you'd think that every gringo visitor to CR or other countries is at serious risk to life and limb. However, anyone who has actually been to any of these places knows the threat is overblown. I just completed a monthlong bus tour throughout Central America. Before the trip, my mom and a few of my friends thought it sounded a little dangerous and that I might be at serious risk of being robbed on one of those buses. And yet in all the miles I covered I did not experience even one moment of fear from crime. My biggest fear was getting on the wrong bus and winding up someplace I didn't know how to get myself out of of (which actually happened to me once in the mountains above Tegucigalpa). But that is the image most people in the US have of these places.
Even seasoned travelers hearing these tales can buy into it. This is probably not the best example, but some of you may have heard of Nibu Raphael, admittedly not the most stable characters in the mongering community. However, he is a veteran of remote bus journeys and cheap cheap hotels all over South America, and yet he posted recently on ISG worrying about getting held up by MS13 gang members on the buses in Honduras and El Salvador. Sure it happens occasionally on some of the thousands of daily bus trips all over the region, but the odds are no greater there than they'd be in someplace like Colombia which Nibu evidently survived.
The same can happen with us. We read the media reports and we hear the tales of misfortune (usually 2nd hand) of some gringo we may or may not know being mugged. But we fail to put that into the context of just how many of us are out there going about day to day without any incident or focus on that possible threat while overlooking or at least not considering hard enough the far larger risks involved with our little hobby.
-------------
Evidently I'm not the only person that feels this way. Check out this recent editorial from the NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/opinion/30friedman.html?ref=opinion