I was just throwing some ideas out there. Kinda thinking aloud. I'm glad to see that CC and El C got it and understood where I was coming even if they may not have agreed with all my points. I would like to add a few followup comments to address some of the counterpoints presented.
First, I don't think it is necessary for them to actually come here and read the posts or even to see our membership cards. Whereas most mongers that come to SJ hang in solo or in groups of 2-4, they see CRTers hanging in larger groups or walking around seeming to know many of the other guys there. They may not know CRT but the can at least guess we might part of some sort of group. Many have also heard of CRT, if not by having visitied it then by being told by some CRTer or other chica. If they see you with other well-known CRTers like VB who seems to know half the chicas in the BM or hang with TMan at Kamur they can probably guess you're a CRT'er too. Its obviously not nearly 100%, but probably more of these chicas know that there's some sort of association of guys if not the name than you might expect and if they do they also often can figure out which guys are part of it. Besides, we do flash our cards when we go to places like Kamur and ZB and given the number who have posed for TOM I'd say its a rare ZB or Kamur girl who hasn't heard of our group. Perhaps I'm giving the BM girls too much credit, but I don't think that is a huge exaggeration.
OTOH, whether you buy the above argument or not, I think CC's second point is much more significant. Even if there were an issue of what sort of image CRT has with chicas, what could we or should we do about it. We could try to put more teeth into enforcing it, but how would we fairly apply it and what would stop guys from trying to go around it? Nothing really.
NOW DWAYNE,
Where do I even begin. Man you really need to take a class in logic as your thinking is usually so twisted.
Dwayne2864 wrote:
The pictures on CRT - they are behind a member ID and password ...Unless there are a few guys showing pictures to Chicas, I doubt many Chicas can get into the VIP area. Please let's not argue over how many have seen the pictures, because relative to the number of Putas out there not many have seen the pictures.
Dah, exactly there are far too many guys who from some twisted attempt to curry some sort of favor with a chica or some other unfathomable motivation show them the photos. And, right, lets not argue with how many have seen the pictures, they probably are relatively few, but thats all it takes. The chica net works well and the word gets out to even those who haven't seen it themselves. Maybe not 100% given the new girls that float in and out of the business but certainly with the core group that has been there for any length of time and has connections with their fellow chicas.
Dwayne2864 wrote:
for those that are nude or whatever too bad for the Chica if she doesn't want her picture displayed. She shouldn't have been so stupid to pose nude even if the guy said he wouldn't post it on the internet.
If you really believe that you have the morals of a snake. Based on that argument any guy that really only wants a picture for his private collection shouldn't always be able to take it because the girl can never trust him to keep his word. Or how about this? She shouldn't be so stupid to agree to be paid after the act even if the guy promises he will. At some point one said or the other has to be able to have a little faith in the basic integrity of the other party. When that faith is violated the ultimate onus of responsibility should be on the person that lied not the person that believed him. Even if you do want to blame the victim, you can hardly compare her sin to that of the cheat. You just don't seem to get this and you probably never will.
Dwayne2864 wrote:
If you are against VT a puta, I can't see how you can justify looking at the pictures considering you haven't a clue if she CONSENTED. You shouldn't subscribe to a double standard though I bet someone will attempt to rationalize this double standard. People that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
Another specious argument. I can only assume whatever I'm looking at was done consentually. I wasn't there. But like the chica who poses for a pictures based on assurances how those pictures would be handled, I can only operate on the assurance of the poster that he has gotten proper consent. Sure some of those pictures may have violated those standards but I have no way of knowing which ones or even knowing for sure if any of them have. Comparing that sort of situation with those of the guy who
knowingly violated a chica's trust and
actually made the inappropriate post is no where near the same thing.
Dwayne2864 wrote:
I couldn't find many men that knew about CRT, let alone Chicas. A lot of the putas are from Columbia, Nicaragua, DR and Costa Rica. As poor as Nicaragua and Columbia are, I doubt many of these high school dropouts have been within 100 yards of a computer. The puta from outside of CR revolve in and out of CR, because many of them go back to see their K*ds so again few mongers and puta know about CRT.
That most guys in CR have never heard of CRT is a given that has never been disputed. Chicas are something else. Highschool drop-outs yes. Completely ignorant no. Within 100 yards of a computer, well seeing as though there are at least 2 that I know of in the HDR lobby right next to where they sign in to go upstairs, that is patently absurd. I frequently see chicas (inlcuding nicas and colombianas) doing their e-mails and more than a few hear routinely receive the RFM's from chicas by e-mail. So question if you will their awareness of CRT, but don't think for a moment that they are all somehow too stupid to get on a computer. And whats with the puta comment? Between your apparent acceptance of this guys right to victimize these girls, your low regard for their intelligence and your usage of disparaging terms, you're own values and willingness to judge others.
BTW, you keep saying its okay to take secret videos as long as its only for personal use. That is rationalizing. If its okay to do, then do it openly and ask her. If you don't ask her and you get caught expect her to be angry and suspect the worst. How does she know what you will do with the images? You just said she should suspect the worst and maybe because of guys lying to her or hiding cameras she should. You said that there are all sorts of reasons why a girl can be untrusting. And that is true, but incidents such as this certainly go directly to that issue and are probably a large part of that particular concern.
Now Zippy your turn,
Zippy wrote:
Here is one part that many men are guilty of in the HDR. Some guys just whip out a camera & flash I am in it on the other side of the bar & no one asked anyone’s consent at all. But if I don't like it I should not be there at all. But I accept this because it goes with the territory. Anybody else have this happen. You are not suppose to take photos in HDR but it happens a lot. What happens if your mug gets on the internet this way & the wife sees some Chica was all over you?YIKES!

You may accept it, but clearly you don't like it and think it is wrong. Was that supposed to be an argument in favor of this guy's right to do what he did? Also forget about the few rare guys that snap pictures in the BM, what does that have to do with you taking pictures of chicas? Its not the chicas that are taking pictures of you. What did they do to deserve that? Security cameras cover every inch of that place and they don't bother to hide that fact. So you've already basically consented to being recorded as soon as you stepped in there, albeit not to being posted on the internet. Plus its a public place and hardly the same thing of having nudie shots or even shots of you performing intimate sexual acts taken in a private room where no camera is expected or visible. You go in with the expectation that she is not going to take pictures of you that she will post someplace where your wife will see it. Shouldn't she be able to have that same assumption? Its called being mutually discrete.
Zippy wrote:
The Chicas could care less about CRT all they want is their money as quick as they can get it & either go home or find more money. If any thing I believe we are of less value & more trouble to them if they see us organized. I rather be the independent negotiator than being categorized as one of those hard to deal with no cien type of men. That may keep them away from you more than you think. It is really better I believe if CRT is invisible to them in HDR & KL. Let us organize & educate ourselves here but not advertise it. Better too be the fox in the hen house isn't it?
This is an excellent point and could very well be the ultimate argument as far as this issue is concerned. In fact, you should note that I listed this very thing as the 2nd negative in my list. I think that there are both positives and negatives to having a CRT "brand name". This is a powerful argument for keeping a lower profile.