Wow!!! Why are so many people misreading what I've been saying. Fiirst TMG suggesting that I'm advocating resisting arrest and attacking the police or trying to flee from them on foot, and now this.
WHERE did I say ANYWHERE that anyone DESERVES to have their money stolen? What I did say was, first, that they shouldn't be surprised if their money is stolen, given the numerous reports of muggings and shakedowns that have occurred. Wasn't that EXACTLY the point of TMG's post? I did go further to say it would be idiotic to COMPLAIN about losing
so much money IF they unneccessarily carry such large sums of cash AND they should know that there is such a real possibility that they could get hit (again wasn't the LARGE amount that was demanded also exactly TMG's point). The distinction between that and saying those "idiots" DESERVE to get robbed may seem subtle to you, but it seems quite significant to me. The term "idiots" may have been unduly harsh but other than that and I stand by the main thrust of my remarks.
Also, WHERE did I ever say you should
not have some emergency cash tucked away somewhere on your person. I actually completely AGREE that you'd be an idiot not to have ANY cash on you. Where we disagree is over what constitutes having an ADEQUATE supply of emergency cash AND what constitutes having excess cash "tucked" away.
One SHOULD carry sufficient money to be able to take a cab back to one's hotel. That's 2K colones to most places we stay, but lets call that 4K. Another strong argument could be made for having "shakedown money". Normally, that would be another 10K. You only need $100 to pay off the cops if you have that much on you. Cops will and have settled for much less and would probably settle for nothing at all, once they think that's all you have (can't get blood from a stone). So what we're really talking about is more like $30 at most which is a far cry from $100. Having $100 won't do anything to keep you from being robbed. All that it will achieve is having you lose that much more.
Not only did I NOT suggest not having any emergency cash (triple negative, how's that JB

) I clearly actually expressed the need to have such emergency funds when I mentioned the need to keep "the bulk of whatever money I had stuffed down my shorts or some other secret place". IMHO, carrying that much excess "emergency funds" in a wallet along with one's passport copy where it can easily be found (or am I making another incorrect assumption), is not really providing for emergencies. It is really just making a bigger pot for the crooks to steal.
-------
There are others who seem to be selectively reading my posts and completely misinterpreting what I've been saying. There have been suggestions of flaming and smugness and there has been some bruised feelings. Well, I'm sorry that TMG took such offense at my interpretation of what happened to him, but I'm not sorry about anything I've said or how I've said it.
Did TMG make his post as just a bid for sympathy? Well, he's got all our sympathy INCLUDING mine. Witness my concluding remark from my very first post "Regardless of all the above, I'm still sorry to hear about your misfortune."
Or did TMG make his post to be instructive for the rest of us? If so, then let us discuss what happened to him freely and see what lessons are to be learned. To the extent I made unwarranted assumptions about his SPECIAL case, it is really besides the point if the point was to understand how what happened to him applies to the vast majority of the rest of us for whom those assumptions WOULD be valid.
Did TMG expect everyone to agree with all of his actions in this case? Again, I'm sorry to disappoint. I actually readily understand why he did some of the things he did, but I don't agree with all of it or at least don't think they were things the rest of us would have to do the same way, particularly the things he did or didn't do leading up to his getting in that police car. In all my posts, I was merely expressing my opinions and the basis for those opinions. I allowed for the fact that others could disagree. As I said in my last post to TMG: "I was just offering my own thoughts on what you should have done. Everyone else is free to agree or disagree." I should add, if I recognize that right for you, shouldn't you extend that same right for me.
Was I being smug and unfair in telling someone how they should react in a pressure situation? My concluding point in my very first post stated: "11) I realize that my advice is easy to give sitting safely at home in my chair rather than sitting in the back of some police car in some scary barrio." In another concluding paragraph a couple of posts later I wrote "Sure MG made a few mistakes that may have helped put him into that situation and should have known better about those. But we all sometimes slip up when we're on the ground and when we're in a tense situation like MG was it is anybody's guess how they'll react. Our posts on the other hand are made in the luxury of calm and reflection." As recently as this morning I wrote: " it is easy for someone like me to say how one SHOULD react HYPOTHETICALLY in such a situation while seated safely at home. How we'd ACTUALLY react if we ACTUALLY were in that situation is quite possibly another story. I actually acknowledged as much myself at least a couple of times already. IF I had a lot of money on me and was trapped in a patrol car in some strange and dangerous neighborhood and was being threatened with the things you were, I might have done exactly as you had done or even probably would have."
So I'm not feigning any greater intelligence or courage than anyone else here, but I do think calmly and carefully considering the alternatives (and preventatives) beforehand OUT of that pressure cooker could help prepare you to make more intelligent later on.
And finally flaming, apart PERHAPS from my use of the word "idiot" in just my last post, I have expressed all of my positions civilly and without any real name-calling and I've conceded that others might justifiably hold different views. I offered my views for serious discussion and not just to stir up controversy. How is that flaming? Because I disagree with some of you. You're disagreeing with me too, maybe I'm the one being flamed here for having the temerity to hold a different opinion and not just obsequiously say oh poor TMG, there wasn't ANYTHING AT ALL that you could have done to POSSIBLY have avoided this situation.