Well my 2 cents worth ...
1) As the guy who coined M-men - the original definition was a monger who had decided he would like to spend all (or basically a strong majority) of his time with 1 gal ... that was it. I love how the pitchforks and burning bushes have come out

. the diffeentiation for those who recall was that after a very few # of trips I had felt empty and found I did not want to just get off. I wanted more. I knew it was a fantasy but MY fantasy was to spend a lot of time with one gal. Never made a judgement on what was better or worse. this is a mongering board. If you monger with 1 or 100 or the number VB mongers with (

) well you are all just different. Now Im married ... I'm not an M-man .... Who knows what I am
2) At another time in the past I had suggested and understand it was a bad idea, but had suggested that some folks who really had a great time in a different era on this board would like a separate section. I morphed my request and simply thought it would be cool if you could have a MY LIST where you can see the new posts of your fav folks. That was twisted into I was an elitist who wanted a clique. Not really. I just wanted to see if Circus, VB, Dino, Lurker, LH, Paco, Showerhead etc etc had said anything as I know them and like their style. No harm no foul.
3) I really dont know how (with respect to admin) this thread became a smash on m-men. This was about the rating system.
To all ... all "evils" arent m-men ... they are a subset that some of us drift into and out of. Others are orgy guys, others LAL, others GFFE and yet others biker chick guys (Paco, Dman).
enjoy what is here for what it is .. and please dont tar and feather the definition of an m-man ....