www.CostaRicaTicas.com

Welcome to the #1 Source for Information on Costa Rica
It is currently Tue Jul 29, 2025 9:21 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:03 am 
Ticas ask me for advice!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 3:30 am
Posts: 321
Location: NYFB
Most of the Americans busted in Toronto were NewYorkers.

They certainly don't stand out. :lol:

In Nassau it didn't take Columbo to watch and follow passengers from the inbound gate, see that they were holding US passports in their hands as they walked to the Nassau customs area. Doh! Then walk outside down the sidewalk to check-in for a flight the US. Next stop Pre-clearing at US customs/immigration. Not to bright. The smart ones spent a night in Nassau before heading back home.

Any US citizens going to Cuba through cities like Toronto or Nassau are asking for trouble.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:00 pm 
Ticas ask me for advice!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:43 pm
Posts: 387
Location: Miami
LionKing wrote:
Irish Drifter wrote:
LionKing wrote:
Could you provide 1 person who has been fined or prosecuted for going to Cuba. It's a lot of BS.
Taken out of context again like you do with every post I make or someone you have issues with. :roll: Come on show me 1 person who has been indited, :lol: your act like you know everything but when your put on the spot you just ignore the question or beat around the bush. :oops: I ask a few simple questions about Cuba, no I haven't been there but I have researched american travel to Cuba. From now on I'm calling you Fidel Drifter. 8) NEXT!!!!! :arrow:


Sorry ID but the edge has to go to the LionKing on this issue. Yes it is against the law to go to Cuba and spend $$$ without authorization from the US Governement. However, the law is rarely if ever enforced. I just did a legal search, on Westlaw, and there are no reported cases for the last 25 years, in the 11th judicial circuit, which covers Florida, Georgia & Alabama, in which a person was prosecuted under this law. That's not to say it has never happened but such cases would have to be very very rare. Keep in mind that a person who loses a criminal case gets a free appeal. In other words if a person was convicted under this statute , and had no money for a lawyer, he would get one appointed to him, and then appeal. The decision would be reported.

I was in federal court earlier today and asked a prominent latin judge if they had ever heard of a prosectuion under this statute and was told no. I myself have never heard of such a case actualluy prosescuted in Florida.

Remember things such as Sodomy are still felonies in Florida. This would make any gay judge subject to a prison sentence. However, I have never heard of a consensual anal sex case , between adults, ever prosecuted in Florida.

Having said all of the above, my advise would be not to phuck with Cuba until the laws change.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:01 pm 
Ticas ask me for advice!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 461
Location: The Friendly Confines
I may have posted this before, but the only person I know who was caught traveling to Cuba was detained because they had a new passport with two Bahamas entry stamps within the same week and nothing in between. From what I've been told, this is really the only way for US immigration officials to suspect that you've been in Cuba.

The US immigration booths in Nassau are in their own terminal and you only pass through them when you are returning to the US. So I can't believe that they are somehow watching people who arrive in the other terminal to see if they are heading to Cuba. Keep in mind that all the flights to the out islands leave from the same terminal as Cubana and many Americans head to one of the other islands after arriving in Nassau. Also, the Bahamas is filled with Canadian ex-pats who frequently connect through Miami, so again I don't know how they would even know if the person is American or Canadian.

It may not be worth the risk to a lot of you, but I honestly believe the odds of getting caught are miniscule if you have several pages full of stamps in your passport.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:03 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:24 pm
Posts: 11358
Location: Sabana Oeste , Costa Rica
Loco Mike wrote:

Sorry ID but the edge has to go to the LionKing on this issue. Yes it is against the law to go to Cuba and spend $$$ without authorization from the US Governement. However, the law is rarely if ever enforced.




The challenge from LK was to show if a single person had ever been prosecuted not how frequently the law was applied.

Quote:
http://www.afrocubaweb.com/travelcuba.htm

Be sure to read this:

In all the years of the travel restrictions, up until the Bush 2 administration, very few people had been prosecuted. The Office of Foreign Assets Control in the Treasury Department said in 1999 that there have been only 16 criminal prosecutions for nine violations since 1983.Since 2001, the number has gone up, and prosecutions are much more numerous, with hefty fines imposed of $6,000 to $10,000. The penalties on record are stiff: $250,000 fine and up to 10 years in the pen, but until fairly recently fines have been minimal. Traveler, beware! The situation has gotten to the point where people are getting together to create a legal defense organization to defend the right to travel.



Clearly there have been prosecutions the fact that perhaps none have occurred in the 11th judicial circuit is not relevant to the point.

_________________
:D Pura Vida :D
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four
essential food groups:
alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat.
Alex Levine
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:17 pm 
Ticas ask me for advice!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:43 pm
Posts: 387
Location: Miami
Sorry ID your still wrong. The kind of cases prosecuted under this statute are basically commercial transaction cases. For example some people/entities have been prosecuted for selling a large amount of airplane or automobile parts to Cuba contrary to the relevant statutes. What LionKing is talking about is individual travelers being prosecuted for going to Cuba, through a third country, contrary to the law. To the best of my knowledge these cases are essentially non-existent.

The 11th circuit would be the most likely venue for a prosecution of this nature due to it's proximity to Cuba. In other words if you broke this law, and the feds figured it out, they would arrest and subsequently prosecute you at your place of entry which would likely be Miami in this region of the world. In other words even if you lived in Wyoming or some far away place you would be indicted where your plane arrived not where you reside. The fact that there have been no reported cases of the nature which LionKing speaks of in the Southern region of the United States, for over 25 years, is relevant. Also keep in mind the number of Cubans who live in the South Florida area exceeds 1 million and apparently none of them have been prosecuted under this statute.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:24 pm 
Loco Mike wrote:
Sorry ID your still wrong. The kind of cases prosecuted under this statute are basically commercial transaction cases. For example some people/entities have been prosecuted for selling a large amount of airplane or automobile parts to Cuba contrary to the relevant statutes. What LionKing is talking about is individual travelers being prosecuted for going to Cuba, through a third country, contrary to the law. To the best of my knowledge these cases are essentially non-existent.

The 11th circuit would be the most likely venue for a prosecution of this nature due to it's proximity to Cuba. In other words if you broke this law, and the feds figured it out, they would arrest and subsequently prosecute you at your place of entry which would likely be Miami in this region of the world. In other words even if you lived in Wyoming or some far away place you would be indicted where your plane arrived not where you reside. The fact that there have been no reported cases of the nature which LionKing speaks of in the Southern region of the United States, for over 25 years, is relevant. Also keep in mind the number of Cubans who live in the South Florida area exceeds 1 million and apparently none of them have been prosecuted under this statute.

:) :) Loco Mike, you will never win :? :? IrateDisaster is the alpha dog around here :shock: :shock:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:16 pm 
Ticas ask me for advice!

Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 1:10 am
Posts: 414
Location: Sniffing your novias BUTT
Squidface wrote:
:) :) Loco Mike, you will never win :? :? IrateDisaster is the alpha dog around here :shock: :shock:


No he's NOT! GROWLLLL :lol:

_________________
Beware of the DOG!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:58 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:24 pm
Posts: 11358
Location: Sabana Oeste , Costa Rica
Loco Mike wrote:
Sorry ID your still wrong. The kind of cases prosecuted under this statute are basically commercial transaction cases. For example some people/entities have been prosecuted for selling a large amount of airplane or automobile parts to Cuba contrary to the relevant statutes. What LionKing is talking about is individual travelers being prosecuted for going to Cuba, through a third country, contrary to the law. To the best of my knowledge these cases are essentially non-existent.



That's an interesting supposition but at this point that all it is. You have not introduced anything to back it up.

From the Havana Journal:

Quote:
At the same time, it appears prosecutions are on the rise. In 2004, the Treasury Department announced the appointment of three Administrative Law Judges to start reviewing cases dating back to 1999 and sometimes later. In the first quarter of 2005, OFAC fined 307 Americans for violating the embargo, almost the same amount that had been prosecuted in all of 2004, which saw 316 Americans get fined.


No where does it indicate that all of that number were engaged in commercial transactions and it strains common sense to suppose it.

Then there is this from Google Answers:

Quote:
"US fines veteran cyclist 5,000 for taking holiday in Cuba

Duncan Campbell in Los Angeles
Wednesday February 26, 2003
The Guardian

Joan Slote, who went on a cycling holiday to Cuba, was fined nearly
$8,000 ( 5,000) for breaking the US embargo of the island. Her case is
one of a growing number in which the US treasury department is
actively pursuing Americans who have visited the island or who are
suspected of encouraging others to do so.

The numbers of American visitors sought for breaking the embargo has
quadrupled since the Bush administration took office. The treasury
department now warns that those who visit without permission may face
fines of up to $55,000. The moves come despite a growing campaign in
the US among farmers, entrepreneurs and politicians, many of them
Republicans, to end the embargo. Currently, Americans are banned from
visiting Cuba unless they have a licence to do so on religious,
humanitarian, educational or journalistic grounds...."


Her "commercial" enterprise, which she admitted to ICE on reentering the U.S. was that she had purchased $18.00 in souvenirs and payed a $20.00 departure tax at the Havana airport.

As to the 11th Judicial Circuit. Certainly this case taken from U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement web site should land there.

Quote:
February 22, 2007
ICE-led investigation unravels Cuba travel scheme that netted more that $1 million in profits
Two men arrested and charged with knowingly conspiring to circumvent OFAC regulations to facilitate travel to Cuba under false religious pretenses

MIAMI- Two men who conspired to defraud the U.S. government by soliciting religious licenses for travel to Cuba were arrested here Wednesday following an investigation led by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

In a criminal complaint unsealed today, Victor Vazquez and David Margolis were charged with conspiring to violate Cuba-related travel regulations. Vazquez is additionally charged with making materially false statements in applications to obtain religious travel licenses to Cuba. As alleged, the fraudulently obtained religious licenses were then used to facilitate more than 4,500 trips to Cuba.

This complaint is the direct result of the work of the Cuban Sanctions Enforcement Task Force, which was launched in Oct. 2006, to investigate and prosecute violations of existing U.S. economic and trade sanctions against Cuba. The Task Force, chaired by the U.S. Attorney's Office, includes members from ICE, OFAC, FBI, IRS, Department of Commerce - Office of Export Enforcement, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the Field Operations, Air and Marine and Border Patrol divisions of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Each member agency brings a wealth of experience and particular expertise in areas necessary to successfully investigate and prosecute embargo violations.

The complaint charged Vazquez and Margolis with one count of conspiring to defraud the United States by impairing, obstructing, and defeating the Office of Foreign Assets Control's (OFAC) administration and oversight of the Cuban Assets Control Regulation's restrictions on transactions related to travel to Cuba and to commit an offense against the United States by making materially false statements in an application for a religious travel license submitted to OFAC. Vazquez is additionally charged with two substantive counts of making false statements in two separate applications for religious licenses for travel to Cuba. Each charge is punishable by up to five years imprisonment.

"Those who seek to circumvent our nation's laws by traveling to Cuba under false pretenses should know that they too will be held accountable," said Anthony Mangione, acting special agent in charge of the ICE Office of Investigations in Miami. "ICE will continue working with its law enforcement partners to enforce America's travel restrictions to Cuba."

United States Attorney Alex Acosta stated, "Today's criminal charges are a wake-up call to those who seek to violate the economic and trade sanctions against Cuba. The United States Attorney's Office is determined to enforce vigorously the sanctions program against the Cuban regime, with the aim of hastening a transition to democracy in Cuba."

"Those who seek to evade U.S. sanctions face serious legal consequences," said Adam J. Szubin, director of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control. "Facilitating fraudulent religious travel to Cuba is a crime, and it unfortunately undermines the good works of legitimate religious groups."

Charles E. Hunter, Acting Special Agent in Charge for the IRS said, "The IRS remains committed to working with the U.S. Attorney's Office in this task force and to vigorously investigate violations of the tax laws."

The Cuban Assets Control Regulations were first issued by the U.S. Government on July 8, 1963, under the Trading With the Enemy Act and remain in force today. The sanctions program applies to all U.S. citizens and permanent residents wherever they are located, to all persons and organizations physically in the United States, and to all branches and subsidiaries of U.S. organizations throughout the world. Administered by OFAC, the basic goal of the sanctions is to isolate the Cuban government economically and deprive it of U.S. dollars.

Under the law, persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States are prohibited from engaging in Cuba travel-related transactions, unless authorized by OFAC. OFAC issues licenses to religious organizations, and allows individuals in those organizations to travel to Cuba to engage in religious activities under the auspices of the organization that holds the license. Pursuant to the regulation, however, travel-related transactions under the religious license "must be for the purpose of engaging, while in Cuba, in a full time program of religious activities."

According to the complaint affidavit, Vazquez engaged in a scheme through which he fraudulently obtained licenses for religious travel to Cuba by providing false information on the OFAC license applications. Vazquez and Margolis, individually or jointly, fraudulently obtained religious licenses in the names of non-existent churches, including Assumption Church of Christ, Interact Faith Ministry, Outreach Hispanic Ministries, and Woodland Church of Christ.

These fraudulent licenses, according to the allegations, were then provided to travel service providers, which sold the use of the fraudulently obtained travel licenses to thousands of individuals seeking to travel to Cuba for non-religious purposes. Travel agencies sold airline tickets and authorization to travel under these religious travel licenses to individuals who otherwise could not legally travel to Cuba, charging each traveler $250 for the use of the fraudulently obtained license. Individuals who have traveled under these licenses have admitted that they did not travel for religious purposes. Through this scheme, between April 2006 and Jan. 2007, more than 4,500 travelers used the fraudulently obtained religious licenses to travel to Cuba.

Today's announcement was made by Anthony Mangione, acting Special Agent in Charge of the ICE Office of Investigations in Miami; R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; Adam Szubin, Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) - Department of the Treasury; Jonathan I. Solomon, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office; Charles E. Hunter, acting Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service (IRS); Michael L. Johnson, Special Agent in Charge, Office of Export Enforcement, Department of Commerce, Miami Field Office; Rear Admiral David W. Kunkel, Commander of the 7th Coast Guard District; Thomas S. Winkowski, Director, Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Miami Field Office; and John Beutlich, Director, Air Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Mr. Mangione commended the investigative efforts of all Task Force members and the City of Miami Police Department, the Miami-Dade Police Department, the Broward Sheriff's Office and the South Miami Police Department for their outstanding work in this investigation. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Karen Gilbert and Scott Edenfield.

-- ICE --

_________________
:D Pura Vida :D
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four
essential food groups:
alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat.
Alex Levine
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:47 pm 
Ticas ask me for advice!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:43 pm
Posts: 387
Location: Miami
ID, I realize that you get a certain amount of your self worth by being a know it all on this website. That is why you have nearly 8,000 post. I realize alot of them are useful and you should realize alot of them are useless. Your post on this thread completely miss the point. I dont have the time or inclination to post 8 thousand times. If I were to start today and then make 10 post per day it would take me about 2 1/2 years to catch up to you. This is assuming that you stop posting today. Apparently you are retired and expend a great deal of time lurking on this website and then correcting anyone you think is wrong. I hope that when and if I get to that point in my life, retired, I expend the majority of my time a little differently.

Now on to your post. You are still completely wrong. The first quote is refering to civil court proceedings that are handled by adminsitrative law judges. Administrative law judges are not regular federal judges created by the United States Constitution. They have no power to do anything other than fine a person. The people who are fined have suffered no criminal conviction based on any legal proceeding conducuted by an administrative law judge. The same is true for the for the lady who went cycling in Cuba. She had a civil, not criminal, fine levied against her. No criminal prosecution involved. She was never indcited.

The artcile you posted from the google search proves my point. This was a commercial, criminal, enterprise involving four thousand five hundred (4,500) seperate incidents. Sounds to me like these dudes were making a lot of $$$ of their scam. Based on that artcile it does not appear that any of the individuals who purchased the fraudulently obtained licenses were indicted.

Now back to LionKing's original point and question. How many people have actually been indicted for this offense? Indicted refers to being charged with a crime not being subject to a civil fine. The answer is still around zero.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:02 pm 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:06 pm
Posts: 654
Semantics, That size fine would get my attention. Criminal vs Civil what Phucking difference does it make. You guys do in fact have too much time on your hands.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:04 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:24 pm
Posts: 11358
Location: Sabana Oeste , Costa Rica
I will not bother to quote all your verbiage that has nothing to do with the discussion and concentrate on just this part of your response.

Loco Mike wrote:

Now back to LionKing's original point and question. How many people have actually been indicted for this offense. Indicted refers to being charged with a crime not being subject to a civil fine. The answer is still around zero.


This is what LK actually posted:



LionKing wrote:

Could you provide 1 person who has been fined or prosecuted for going to Cuba.


and this is what I replied.

Irish Drifter wrote:

I am not going to due the research for you. If you do not think people have been fined no problem.


Our discussion has basically been not just about prosecution but also about fines being levied.

You admit I have provided evidence that people have been fined. :shock:

_________________
:D Pura Vida :D
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four
essential food groups:
alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat.
Alex Levine
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:26 pm 
Ticas ask me for advice!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:43 pm
Posts: 387
Location: Miami
MarkL54 wrote:
Criminal vs Civil what Phucking difference does it make.


MarkL54, there are major major differences between a criminal and civil proceeding. Your constitutional rights are completely different and the governments burden is different. The consequences are very different. You lose a criminal case you lose your freedom and go to prison. You loose a civil case you pay some $$$$. In addition if you suffer a criminal convcition you lose certain civil rights are can lose certain occupational and business licenses. In addition if you are applying for a job and you have criminal convictions you may not get interviewed much less hired.

Many times these kind of situations are resolved based on negotiations that if a person pays a hefty civil fine the criminal case will go away. That's why the fines are so stiff. Good deal for both parties, the governement gets a wad of cash and the individual keeps their freedom. Federal court is a very expensive place to be, many times it is cost effective to pay some money instead of paying the lawyers and still facing an indictment.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 4:21 pm 
I can do CR without a wingman!

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:06 pm
Posts: 241
Irish is correct, though difficult, the US government has prosecuted individuals and more importantly groups that have traveled to Cuba. However, this number is very low since the embargo.

I personally know more then 10 individuals some living in CR that have traveled to Cuba without any trouble.

The Cubans will issue you a stamp and then ask for it before you leave. You will never get your passport stamped if you are a US citizen. They will ask you.

The down side is at times you may be followed, but mostly you are very safe in the country.

As far as cigars and shit like HC Rum, well I have never known an individual to get in trouble for this shit. In fact, I have many times traveled with it back to the states. Never an issue.

I would not tell anyone to break any law. Irish is correct, you can get prosecuted for traveling to Cuba. Upside? You may have the memories of a life time. Who knows...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:05 pm 
Just Learning The Gulch!

Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 5:24 pm
Posts: 32
Location: cayman
if one were to purchase cigars or havana club either in cuba or say here(cayman)is it legal to bring them into the u.s.?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:27 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:24 pm
Posts: 11358
Location: Sabana Oeste , Costa Rica
Hox wrote:
if one were to purchase cigars or havana club either in cuba or say here(cayman)is it legal to bring them into the u.s.?


No.

_________________
:D Pura Vida :D
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four
essential food groups:
alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat.
Alex Levine
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group