Article from Diario Extra about tourists being upset over the totality of the no smoking legislation. What I find interesting is the confusion about where you can smoke and where you cannot. It would seem no one knows the answer to that until, and maybe not even then, the complete set of regulations are published.
TOURISM LAW AGAINST SMOKING suffers
Maria Siu Spears
msiu@diarioextra.comThe new law against smoking is annoying to many of the tourists, who have even mentioned the possibility of not returning home for the discomfort that causes them not being able to light a cigarette.
DAILY EXTRA knew of several hoteliers and shop owners, who demanded anonymity, they have received complaints of tourists from various destinations.
The Executive Director ai of the National Chamber of Tourism (Canatur), Jason Allen, said that foreigners have actually expressed surprise about the radicalism of the Act
"When visitors have previously been in this country is where there is any discomfort. So far it has been manageable, since the Act has been published; us as we try to encourage Chamber members adhere to it, in fact we are in a training process,
the prohibition is absolute, common areas, gardens, rooms , parking ... "said Alvarado.According to Canatur, employers are also awaiting the publication of the regulation to see operational issues, including how to handle the issue of sanctions, actions can be taken and other logistical issues.
Alvarado said some tourism companies have faced the Act enabling some street spaces for visitors to smoke. "It's difficult because for some hotels near the street is simple, but not for those who are more withdrawn, there are some aspects that are not as clear as the parking space is an annex and Guardian workplace, so we interpret that is within the restricted area, "he added.
WILL FIGHT restaurateurs
The president of the Costa Rican Chamber of Restaurants and Related (Title Co.), Manuel Burgos, said they are presented this month by management before the Constitutional Court, because they believe that the law is disproportionate.
"This is a very interesting case that is based on individual freedoms, remember that the Constitutional Court has already told people that things were badly done and sent back.
Burgos said that are not opposed to regulation, but the way in which they did. "It's the bottom what is wrong because on the road banned the sale of a legal product, there's a whole theme around which our lawyers have been handling," he said.