www.CostaRicaTicas.com

Welcome to the #1 Source for Information on Costa Rica
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:21 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

How do most of them think?
Put up an impenetrable emotional wall. Treating it just as a business is better in the long run 6%  6%  [ 3 ]
Put up a good act. Those suckers will pay good money for your GFE performance 23%  23%  [ 12 ]
Treat your better clients as friends. To them you're not just a hooker 19%  19%  [ 10 ]
You can't differentiate. Any guy who treats you half nice could end up being your white knight 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Who knows how the chica mind works. Their reasons are as varied as there are hookers in the BM 51%  51%  [ 27 ]
Total votes : 53
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 3:03 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 2:34 pm
Posts: 1503
Location: Pits of Jax
YO Primative Peckers:

Geezzz, CRdreamin.....that was a knowledgable and good post. I really like the female bird one, no wonder there are so many SOBs running around. Damn, sure says something about the poor cockold male bird doing all the hen pecked honey do's around the nest. Hmmm, could be a new topic on this site...."pornographic beak behavior"or "Three in the attic nest", "She gives good beak or BBBBJ", Shut up Circus.

Yea, and all the rich men's K*ds having mechanics or plumbers for daddies. Shit, could explain why I have this sexual attraction for shower heads and gold faucets. Circus, go to bed.

_________________
Damn if I'm going to repeat this shit again. I need a drink.
I've been drinking vodka every day for 45 years and I have certainly never found it to be habit forming.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 6:37 pm 
Masters Degree in Mongering!

Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2003 7:51 pm
Posts: 672
I posted a website earlier that claims 20% of Ch*ldren are being raised by non-biological fathers that don't know better. That seems high, however I personally know a man in my office with two boys. They had health problems and sure enough they were not his.

http://www.nomarriage.com/paternity_test.shtml

Here is the bitch of it, the State still demands you pay Ch*ld support, it isn't the governments fault your wife is a sleeping-around whore.

Damn when did I become such a GRINGA BASHER ??


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:56 pm 
PHD From Del Rey University!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:56 am
Posts: 3985
Location: Tampa, FL
I don't know when you became such a gringa basher, but reading websites like that certainly will augment any negative attitudes you already may have on the subject.

That 20% figure seemed a bit high to me too, so I clicked on your link. At first, it says that "random" DNA checks "prove" that 20% of men who think they are father are not. But what do they mean by "random"?

An important factor in assessing scientific studies is to understand the sampling method. If they really tested a random sample of the general population than the results could be reasonably extrapolated to SUPPORT their 20% estimate for the population as a whole. But if they were really talking about men who chose to go in for paternity tests, as the rest of that article suggests, then an alternative explanation for the high results would be that the men who decided to get a paternity test on their own had some reason to suspect they weren't the father to begin with and therefore the sampling method was not representative. In fact, that 80% were indeed the father DESPITE their suspicions, suggests to me that unless you have some particular reason to suspect your wife to be sleeping around, the odds are pretty good those K*ds are really yours.

Another factor that is important in assessing "scientific" studies is to understand who it is that is making the claim. After all, tobacco company scientists were telling us for years that cigarettes really weren't so bad for us. So I clicked on the links on the paternity test page, which took me to a page where they were selling a e-book manual on "No Marriage" for $9.95. Does this mean they're full of shit? Not necessarily. But it does mean it should be taken with a grain of salt and read in conjunction with other sources.

Actually, I personally tend to share many of the views expressed at that site including marriage makes sense only if you are having K*ds and that having K*ds may be over-rated. They are also big advocates of seeking foreign wives. I think that might have some advantages but then one is really only trading one set of problems for another (mixing cultures). Finally, they had several links about how American Women grousing about guys seeking marriage and/or companionship overseas have no right to complain and if anything have only themselves to blame. RIGHT ON!!

Here is some more interesting links from that website. "Majority of American women have Histrionic and Narcissistic disorders" http://www.nomarriage.com/disorders.html (the link reveals that the medical community puts the figure at 2-3%, but the site's authors think that is a lie). For a little more fun try the cost-of-sex calculator at http://www.costofsex.com/

[/url]


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2



All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group