Srilm wrote:
You'd like me to provide proof, but there is no way to prove WHY someone does what they do. You can call it "talking out of one's ass" if you like, but that's all we can really do.....There's no need to take offense or exception with what I'm saying here.
Okay, since you are wondering, let me just go ahead and break down the statements you made that I consider "talking out of your ass." And there is a difference between doing that and simply stating some reasonable opinions or guesses based on some limited observations...
Srilm wrote:
Funny thing about artists -- musicians in particular -- is that they really don't seem to care what the audience wants.... Just having a system to plug his guitar into and a beer to drink was enough. SR
If the musician wants compensation they are going to some degree care about how their audience responds. And your sweeping characterization of musicians in general, certainly a diverse group, is questionable and wholly unproven. The only evidence you brought is what you claim to know about the personal feelings of one guy that you know. This person is allegedly only interested in a can of beer, an electrical outlet, and an amplifier. Great, but even if wholly true, such is way inadequate to support your assessment of musicians generally, a group comprised of millions and millions of individuals worldwide.
Srilm wrote:
There are some who do it for the money -- 99% of them either "make it big" or quit [playing publicly] after a couple of years.SR
More pontificating, but this time with statistics, “99%,†wow, impressive but nothing at all to back up the claim. Even if 99% of those seeking money either truly hit the big time or quit playing for audiences after two years, something of course absurdly unproven beyond telling us that you were a bartender, you still fail to grasp the complexity of human motivations, while operating from a false dichotomy. Human psychology is typically more complex than either/or propositions. It`s perfectly feasible that many musicians are motivated by both a desire for artistic expression and to make money, along with other factors.
Srilm wrote:
Beware of hanging out in the tourist traps -- Beale St. in Memphis, etc. You'll get a skewed view of the so-called successful artist. For every one of them, there are a hundred more in the same town playing in bars you never heard of for nothing more than a beer and place to stay for the night.SR
More assertions of "fact," do you expect people to just nod and believe you?

So how many regular Beale St. artists are there total? I`ll shoot low and say 50, so 100 for every one of these? That would mean we have 5000 homeless musicians in the city, in it for the art of it, but willing to do a show in a club for a bed to flop on for the night and a can of beer. Sounds like romantic, far fetched nonsense to me, something for blogs and travel guides, not serious discussions, and it all of course comes with no evidence, other than a claim that you`ve lived in music towns and worked as a bartender. But, even if true, there is still financial motive involved, and what specifically qualifies you to ascertain what their actual motive(s) are, or the extent thereof? Is it 90% for the art and 10% for the money? The reverse or some variations in between? Or it is any number of other possibilities depending on the individuals? Hey as Ronnie Van Zant told us, Curtis Lowe wasn`t going to do any playing until he got his drinking money

and to an alky, that`s something highly important. But, at the end of the day, and all things considered, it`s obvious that you just like hearing yourself talk, and from your southerly most orifice. And, that`s really okay sitting around a table belting down cold ones with a group of guys that are doing the same, just don`t publish it on the internet as someone is liable to come along and call you on it…
Srilm wrote:
Now, to go back to one of your points -- even the starving artist puts out a tip jar. True enough -- no one turns down free money. I'd say the test is not how much money goes into the tip jar, but whether the musician shows up next week even if the jar is empty. SR
Passing wind again I`m afraid. It`s not "free money," it`s money they are hoping to earn by entertaining an audience. And, if the audience isn`t appreciative, the same may decide to not play publicy, at least not in a certain venue, irrespective of how much they love their art, whether they "hit it big wthin two years or not,"

so whether they show up on that street corner again may be neither here nor there to your assumption of motivations. There is just a heck of a lot that you don`t know, really have no clue about but are in here speaking authoritative about. Personally, there is only one thing I`m confident you have a good grip on, and that`s buying prostitutes....
