Srilm wrote:
I hope this whole episode will convince some people of what I have been trying to tell them for years -- real estate is an exceedingly poor investment. The richest people in the world did not become so by being landlords or by buying the biggest house in town. Owning a house is great, if that is what you want aside from financial concerns; but I am far ahead of all of my workmakes financially, because I never dumped my money into a house or land. I invested in things that were actually poised for real growth, and have reaped the rewards. Even a certificate of deposit gives a guaranteed return. If the USA didn't give cash away for owning a house, I suspect more people would come to their senses and invest their cash more intelligently.
SR
I don't know, I don't know. Totally agree if the RE was bought at the peak or anywhere above what it cost to run it without a loss. I did some quick calculations last night on my 1 rental property and if it was completely paid off I would be making 9% clear and safe, 6.5%-7% after taxes. That beats any CD and lately most stocks plus it is very stable. Now you need a good renter who themselves doesn't default but it can happen ok. Unfortunately many models esp. those after 2001/2002 still just don't work and are only negative cash flows. One time RE could actually be purchased and positive cash flow from day 1. Even though I bought in 2000 just now having an even cash flow. Was always slightly negative before tax deducts. plus pay a prop. mgmt. fee since a few hours from my house. Traditional RE investments are very long term.
I thought of trying to sell my property right before the stock market crash before it further deflated but now so long as my 4 yr. renter stays in I keep getting a 2% bump in rent every yr. and more and more princ. paid off. Just starting to make a little money now when I could very well need if I lose my job. I will not raise his rent much but a little to pay for increased insuranace, HOAs fees etc.